 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
65.206.118.19
In Reply to: RE: 193L vs. 193M for 110-V service posted by Dyak on July 02, 2007 at 12:46:51
193L is 5H, 193M is 10H. Either will work fine for 110v service.
Follow Ups:
Monolith,
Thank you. I also just found a post by Alan (Audionutge@yahoo.com)where what he says is essentially the same.
Have you (or anyone else) tried the 193M yet?
In your opinion, is there a performance increase (or decrease) that may justify the extra $$ to get one of these over the 193L?
Regardless, I'm psyched....this choke-tweak-thing is very neat.
Doug
It's addictive. I own 2 M's and 4 L's. I've not discovered the point of diminishing returns yet. Still too soon to call. The M's just allow you to have more H's with a single plugin. Some have reported that the L's need a week to settle and the M's need 2-3 weeks to settle. Regardless, you'll notice an immediate change when first plugged in.
SWEETNESS!!!
Alright....PE here I come! Thank you, great to hear that's the case.
Just got home and fired-up the sys and, boy'o'boy, what a nice change relative to last week. These things applied as they are now are probably as neat as the Z-Sleeve Extra Heavies I have decorating my PCs.. but sooooo much less expensive.
I'm gonna give a whirl to a pair of M's: one on each PC IEC that feed my Class D amps....and if I'm really feelin' my oats I may prder a 3rd to place in the PC IEC that feeds my PLC.
Great News!
Thanks again,
Doug
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
