Tube DIY Asylum

RE: Poor Design for a Preamp

138.130.52.161

mwhouston

In Reply to: RE: Poor Design for a Preamp posted by Tre' on February 16, 2025 at 15:22:32

I like your 22k//68K idea. Yet to put the preamp on the CRO. Gain was reduced because there was a hum issue.
| retro-thermionic |

Follow Ups:

Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue - Tre' 20:29:51 02/16/25 (12)
Are you using AC for the 5 volt filament?

You might want to try a critical inductance input choke filter DC supply for a DHT.

Or maybe try Rod Coleman's Filament Regulators.

Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
- RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue - mwhouston 20:34:15 02/16/25 (11)
  Well filtered 6V then a 5V regulator. Also balanced 100ohm/100ohm network with Rk central tap. Hum is not in the filament voltage.
  | retro-thermionic |
  - RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue - Tre' 20:39:48 02/16/25 (10)
    I guess not. So it is either the B+ or a hum field.
    What happens when you move the power supply chassis as far away as possible?
    Do you have a schematic of the power supply?
    Tre'
    Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
    "Still Working the Problem"
    
    Edits: 02/16/25 02/16/25
    - RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue - mwhouston 03:48:34 02/26/25 (2)
      Finally got the preamp on the CRO. With the 300K/100K config, through the DIY shieldless cable (175pF), the upper 3db point was 19khZ into 100K. But, taking the 68K/22K suggestion lead to a much better upper 3db;- 37khZ. Not only that but the preamp was even quieter. One channel reading 0.0mV! Plaid all afternoon and throughly enjoyed it.
      Gain though is only 3db but these are power tubes so what do you expect? It will deliver 4Vpp into 100K. My DIY SE UL EL34 amp has plenty of gain so no concern. Not only that the two are a perfect synergy. Love the sound of this 6N7 preamp and love the metal tubes.
      | retro-thermionic |
      
      Edits: 02/26/25
      - RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue - FlaCharlie 06:32:38 02/26/25 (1)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue posted by mwhouston on February 26, 2025 at 03:48:34
        
        "With the 300K/100K config, through the DIY shieldless cable (175pF), the upper 3db point was 19khZ into 100K. But, taking the 68K/22K suggestion lead to a much better upper 3db;- 37khZ. Not only that but the preamp was even quieter. One channel reading 0.0mV! Plaid all afternoon and throughly enjoyed it.
        
        Gain though is only 3db but these are power tubes so what do you expect? It will deliver 4Vpp into 100K. My DIY SE UL EL34 amp has plenty of gain so no concern. Not only that the two are a perfect synergy. Love the sound of this 6N7 preamp and love the metal tubes."
        
        6N7? Metal tubes? Huh?? Isn't this thread about a 01A preamp?
        
        RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue - mwhouston 13:32:24 02/26/25 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue posted by FlaCharlie on February 26, 2025 at 06:32:38
        
        Looks like I got my threads mixed. But I've had the same problem over four different preamps based on the 01a, 71a, 6N7 and 12AX7 preamps. Forgive the mixup but the result (good result) hopefully will be the same.
        | retro-thermionic |
    - RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue - mwhouston 20:51:24 02/16/25 (6)
      It maybe an earth configuration issue. Ive used my design HT double Pi filtration in wellover 100 builds. Power amps and preamps. None have hums.
      | retro-thermionic |
      - RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue - Tre' 21:37:40 02/16/25 (5)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue posted by mwhouston on February 16, 2025 at 20:51:24
        
        I see the preamp PS is earth grounded. Is the power amp earth grounded?
        
        Tre'
        Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
        "Still Working the Problem"
        
        RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue - FlaCharlie 07:45:40 02/17/25 (4)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue posted by Tre' on February 16, 2025 at 21:37:40
        
        "I like your 22k//68K idea."
        Yeah, if you need to place the gain reduction solution on the preamp I figured that would be a good compromise.
        On the other hand, if you could put it on the amp end of the interconnect that would seem to be even better.
        If I'm understanding this correctly, that would lower the output impedance of the preamp and result in a higher -3db rolloff point. Right??
        Either a simple two resistor voltage divider or a volume pot could be mounted on the amp itself, at the input. This would be great if the preamp was always used with the same amp. But this seems like an unlikely scenario.
        A more versatile solution would be to build the voltage divider into an interconnect which would be used exclusively with this preamp. Or any other pre that's either too noisy or has too much gain.
        One question. If the voltage divider was put on the amp end of the interconnect would it be better to use much larger resistance values than 68k in series with 22k to ground? Wouldn't the 22k to ground be in parallel with the amp's existing input impedance (let's assume 100k)? Or would the 68k, 22k and 100k all be in parallel? Either way that would lower the input impedance significantly (to ~15k) and make the amp harder to drive.
        It that's the case than you could use a combo of 2.2 meg in series and a 750k to ground to get about the same voltage/noise reduction. Or would this create other issues??
        Obviously, if the hum is the result of a ground issue then you could eliminate the voltage divider as long as the increased gain is not an issue.
        
        Edits: 02/17/25
        
        RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue - mwhouston 16:42:17 02/19/25 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue posted by FlaCharlie on February 17, 2025 at 07:45:40
        
        All good ideas.
        | retro-thermionic |
        
        Those are all good ideas but... - Tre' 09:06:57 02/17/25 (2)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Yes, with DHTs hum can be an issue posted by FlaCharlie on February 17, 2025 at 07:45:40
        
        He could just fix the hum problem that started all of this and then he wouldn't need the attenuation at all. Impedance problem solved.
        
        Tre'
        Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
        "Still Working the Problem"
        
        RE: Those are all good ideas but... - mwhouston 13:50:02 02/20/25 (1)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Those are all good ideas but... posted by Tre' on February 17, 2025 at 09:06:57
        
        I tried for months but to no avail. This allows me to enjoy something I have spent a huge amount of time on.
        | retro-thermionic |
        
        "I tried for months but to no avail." - Tre' 18:16:22 02/20/25 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Those are all good ideas but... posted by mwhouston on February 20, 2025 at 13:50:02
        
        I hate when that happens.
        
        Tre'
        Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
        "Still Working the Problem"

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Schiit Audio