![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
128.125.179.205
In Reply to: RE: Backward Power Transformer posted by Paul Joppa on September 21, 2017 at 21:24:04
the secondary's rated voltage is specified under full rated secondary current, with voltage drop in secondary's resistance and core loss factored in. As a result, turns ratio is not 1+1:1.04, but rather something like 1+1:1.35. That's why when turned backwards, the transformer puts out 91+91V.
Follow Ups:
"... turns ratio is not 1+1:1.04, but rather something like 1+1:1.35. That's why when turned backwards, the transformer puts out 91+91V."
Thanks! I spend a lot of time designing high-Q RF transformers, and their behavior is always bidirectional. The fact that a power transformer might be different in this respect just didn't occur to me.
As it turns out, 182V will probably fit my project better than the voltage I was expecting. I need ~250V DC at 40mA, and I think this will just get there. Now I can continue with the layout. Yay!
--------------------------
Buy Chinese. Bury freedom.
Yes, the exact same behavior is observed if you reverse connect either the Triad N-77U or Triad N-68X .
The desired result can be obtained by adding a boost trafo on the AC mains side of things.
Eli D.
Ah, good to know!
So yes, figure the backwards-wired 115V+115V:115V transformer isn't 1+1:1.04 at all. Losses involved. 1+1:1.35?
So it's probably best to use the N-68X wired as normal, with voltage doubling DC rectification. So you get half the current output. With an N-68X I should get 120*2 = 240VAC, rectified to 240*1.3(ish) = 312VDC under load. Correct?
312V*0.1A = 31.2VA, which is within the 50VA rating.
But 312V*0.2A = 62.4VA, and that's too far over the 50VA rating. Gotta bump up to the N-77U for a small stereo power amp. Oh well...
--
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: