![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.126.76.91
In Reply to: RE: Otari MX 5050 BIII-2 question posted by Victor Khomenko on December 25, 2019 at 09:43:41
Re the 4-track issue, my recollection is that the Model B-III, in stock form, did not include a 4-track playback head.To the OP, can you describe the modification that is underway? Your deck WILL use any of the headsteack configurations used by the previous (B-II) models including the ones providing 4-track playback.
EDIT: Just checked my copy of the standard B-III data sheets and, no, it does not include a 4-track playback head. The version that DOES is listed under "Optional Accessories" and designated the Model BIII-P. Don't know why they made this change from prior models.
Edits: 12/25/19Follow Ups:
I keep getting confused between BIII and MkIII - which I have.
BTW - I once bought a "reverse" head block for it, which records and plays in 4-Tracks, plus plays in 2-Tracks. Was it offered as an option for some models?
![]()
Victor, that "reverse" headstack was one of the optional ones that were available with my B-II version, along with one that recorded in full-track mono (and played in mono ... and 2-track stereo).
For the OP, my Otari sounds exactly the same in playback and fast-forward.
Interesting, thank you!
I also have, in my pile of things "just in case" a block with just the erase head. Bought it cheap with the idea of putting some high quality 2-track head for another direct output. It has all the mounting plates with screws and springs, but one has its head mounting holes already drilled bigger - apparently there was something different, not stock, mounted there.
I wonder who makes heads with the same dimensions as stock Otari, but with larger diameter mounting screws?
![]()
Flux Magnetic? Just a guess.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: