Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Return to Planar Speaker Asylum

Planar Speaker Asylum

RE: Oh MeGodz...IT'S ALIVE!!

71.138.52.177

In Reply to: RE: Oh MeGodz...IT'S ALIVE!! posted by Satie on August 28, 2010 at 19:53:00

Are you going to enclose the air space BETWEEN drivers? Isobaric is the name, at least when designing a sub.

Several logical orientations. Both face same way. So, you'd still have choice of mylar or pole pieces facing the listener.
Both mylar out.
Both pole pieces out.

With the 2nd 2 choices, at least with a panel which is divided into high and low frequency sections, you may NOT want the hi from panel #1 facing the lo from panel #2. vice versa, too.

There is a way to line up the HF and LF sections of panels mounted like that......panel #1 is mounted normally. Panel #2 is inverted....the connection tabs are now on the TOP of the panel, so now the HF / LF sections will line up......???

I don't know how strong.....or the distance.....the magnetic field extends. Be careful of interaction here......

Too much is never enough

Follow Ups:

RE: Oh MeGodz...IT'S ALIVE!! - Satie 21:46:46 08/28/10 (3)
I am hoping to get Davey to tell us how he did his experiment and what it actually performed. Then we would know which way to go.

I have seen posts about an Isobaric conversion that was bipolar. The guy liked it but I am skeptical because the panel tuning just shouldn't make it work so easily.
- RE: Oh MeGodz...IT'S ALIVE!! - pictureguy 23:20:52 08/28/10 (2)
  I have NO idea whatsoever how to make this work....or IF it would work. That the panels can go together any of 4 ways, is simple geometry.
  How much space between 'em? Good question! And, for THAT matter, I don't even know what difference the amount of air trapped between drivers would make! Also, could you get the panels close enough together for the Magnets to interact......badly?
  
  But the good news, for me, is that since I can ONLY afford the panels I already OWN, I'm not IN the market for Isobaric Magnepans! (Huge sigh of relief)
  
  My first take would be to go whatever the 'easy' way was. Build a 2x6 frame, route the panel depth on both sides, and mount 'em both pole piece out. Wire 'em in SERIES out of phase. That'll get you to about 8 ohms, fairly flat and needing a couple hundred watts MINIMUM. These would also be a 'natural' for bi-amping. Since I think........(memory....memory?) that you gain about 3db sensitivity in such a situation, you might be OK with only 2x your current amp......Still a bunch.
  
  You'll be a candidate for a tight fitting sleeveless jacket before you're done. And, living in your car with a couple cats. or a Rat Terrier named 'Moe'.
  Too much is never enough
  - RE: Oh MeGodz...IT'S ALIVE!! - Davey 08:07:34 08/29/10 (1)
    Well, they could actually go more than four ways..... :)
    
    Isobaric Magnepans? This isn't an Isobaric configuration fellas....nor is it intended to be. There are no sealed air cavities and there's no attempt to lower bass response or reduce box size by one-half or any other principles associated with a true Isobaric configuration.
    
    All I've done so far is cut a piece of plywood the same size as an MMG frame, routered a "hole" in it the same size as the MMG transducer membrane and then rebated both sides so the transducer frames are flush. The two transducers are mounted mylar-to-mylar and temporarily held in place by spring clamps. There's a gap in between sufficient that possible magnet north/south conflicts are not a concern and the cutouts for the (stock) terminal strips (which are face-to-face) preclude any air sealing of the internal "cavity."
    
    Both elements of the two transducers are wired with opposite polarity for a dipole configuration. (I never even considered wiring them in a bipole configuration....that seemed pretty silly.)
    
    As you know, one MMG transducer (left) has a single button and the other (right) three buttons that create six different panel tuning "zones" so the L/R system won't drone in a narrow range in the bass region. Since I've coupled a left and right transducer together both speakers.....assuming I build another one.....would be identical in this regard. I don't believe this difference in "tunings" between two different transducer panels in the same speaker will be detrimental.
    
    It's just proof-of-concept at this point. I don't think it will be practical ultimately considering the simpler alternatives and the necessity of two pairs of drivers and more complicated construction scheme. Just something to play around with since I have a "spare" pair of MMG transducers.
    
    I am convinced the sandwich scheme is the way to go however. My existing speakers (the ones you've seen the photos of) can also be improved further by removing/reducing some of the variables in that configuration. That's on my plate also.
    
    Cheers,
    
    Dave.
    - RE: Oh MeGodz...IT'S ALIVE!! - Satie 23:12:29 08/31/10 (0)
      I understand now what you did and what you were after, this is interesting and different from what I came across before.
      
      Any preliminary observations on the resulting sound vs. plain ole' MMG?

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: