 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
12.169.244.100
In Reply to: RE: Thank you for the clarification posted by robert.gaboury@videotron.ca on May 26, 2009 at 06:14:47
>Gifts are limited to $100. Accomodation pricing on a pair of big W
>speakers might be well above $25000. That's 250 times higher than
>the "gift" limit.
So what? As has been pointed out to you, the discount pricing, which is
around the product's wholesale price, is available from all manufacturers
to anyone involved in the audio industry. As has been asked of you before
in this thread but which you chose to ignore, where is the opportunity
for corrupt behavior in this scenario?And in addition, reviewers cannot purchase products until after they
review it and cannot resell it for an agreed length of time. And in your
example, the reviewer still has to find the $25,000, which hardly makes
it a "gift.">Either reviewers are too poor to buy full retail (like all customers)
>and manufacturer wants to help for altruistic reasons alone (hum), or
>manufacturers expect said pair might profit on the long run.
You are also ignoring the fact that reviewers, unlike regular customers,
have to purchase multiple components, if their value judgments are not to
emerge from a vacuum.
All these facts have been explained on this forum in the past; I don't
comprehend why you find it so difficult to use the site's search engine.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
Edits: 05/26/09Follow Ups:
I see it's a touchy subject.
A forum is a two way communication tool. As in dialogue. If you do not want to discuss a business practice that non-reviewers (as in "most of your readers") might want to discuss or even question, just move on and skip the subject alltogether.
There is no need to be so defensive, unless you feel you need to defend what seems to be a common practice upon hi-fi reviewers - and not journalists.
> There is no need to be so defensive, unless you feel you need to defend
> what seems to be a common practice upon hi-fi reviewers - and not
> journalists.
This subject has been raised many times in the past and I have posted
comprehensive replies and explanations. You were recommended to read
those responses, which you can find with the "Search" function. I don't
see that as too much of a hardship for you. However, it seems you prefer
I do all that work for you. :-(
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
"If you do not want to discuss a business practice that non-reviewers (as in "most of your readers") might want to discuss or even question, just move on and skip the subject alltogether."
This has been discussed ad nauseam.
You were asked to use the search feature and instead of doing that, you want to continue without reading what's gone before.
Let's not assign guilt unless we've done our due diligence.
Best regards,
Jim Smith
Oh Please go get a grip!
This subject which you have happened upon has been dredged up ad nauseum!!!!
JA isn't touchy about the subject, just fed up of having to the defend the bridge one more bloody time
I am an Aussie
I live in Perth Australia
I have never met JA
I am not on their (Sphile) payroll
I have never received a discount based on the fact i know anything or anyone
And no there is not a world wide conspiracy by Stereophile to make people by expensive equipment,or infiltrate ur drinking water: PS watch out for the Coke a Cola Machine!
Enjoy
DD
Post a Followup:
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
