Amp/Preamp Asylum

Posted by thump (A) on January 06, 2018 at 13:38:36

In Reply to: RE: Funny How ........ posted by SpotcheckBilly12345 on January 04, 2018 at 10:58:53

excuse me Y9U TROLL!

i never claimed my trailer system to be the last word in state of the art sound! crap... the mains have plastic cabinets and PORTS for pete's sake!!!

as a PORTABLE system, yeah... it SHOULD be pretty nice for STREET PARTYING!

listening to the proels nearfield with the planet audio plate was plenty satisfying at low levels. i've noticed that the amp and/or speakers strain at volume having used the system a couple times without the sub, and THAT is THE FIRST report of the system IN ACTION.

you must be another one of those effing annoying port lovers who get their feelers hurt whenever anyone dares to speak THE TRUTH that acoustic suspension IS superior for definition and that the TUNED RESONANCE of ports is A FORM OF DISTORTION.

get over yourself you factually challenged emotional midget!

i've heard B&W 800s on mc intosh (superior treble), vandersteen 5As on hotrodded mc cormack (too thick & lush for my tastes with a dragonfly 1.0), maggie MG12s on tubes (VERY high palpability!), klipsh la scalas on whatever, as well as big maggies sounding like tinfoil or recently driving me out of a room with their hard treble playing my harvest DSotM CD, so i know what both good and bad sound is along with the dozens and dozens of consumer level combos and gear i've owned over the years.

i don't fib! i might not share YOUR audio priorities, or pathetic (bet you're a trump lover) need for social hierarchies, but i tell the truth about EVERYTHING and ALWAYS frame MY PERSPECTIVE as being a detail & speed freak.

i've always admitted the limitations of my own system eg. NHTs can sound beautiful & image effortlessly (better than far faster, airier & palpable maggie MG12s in the specificity department), but lack low level resolution in the hights that can't match GOOD maggies or B&W or that the "upgrade" to energy RC10s gave my system resolution that fears no $1,000 B&Ws or paradigms, especially with their vile DISTORTION HOLES (hope your snowflake eyelid's twitching over that) plugged, BUT had flimsy cabinets that gave them a boxy sound that in the end make superzeros preferable DESPITE their sins of omission in the treble as sins of ADDITION (resonance, overhang & distortion etc.) are far worse.

yeah... trust a TROLL who uses STRAW MAN ARGUMENTS and personal attacks to CHANGE THE SUBJECT who has no evidence ON THE SUBJECT of their own to add to the discussion.

what are YOUR class D credentials TROLL?

"look! look! he has a commoner bicycle system that threatens the cars are kings of the road social order! how dare he challenge MY sense of superiority with all the expensive baubles i wasted my money on? little class D amps? i just know they suck because they're cheap and made in china! stop challenging my fragile sense of self worth! everybody gang up on him! he rides a bike! HE BUYS CHEAP GEAR! HE'S A SCARY OUTSIDER!!!"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

it must be sad to feel so easily threatened by facts that challenge one's world view.

FACT: class D DOES tend to really do details well, both in the treble AND especially in the bass where it has a stellar damping factor grip advantage over MOST amps except really expensive ones

FACT: class D amps generally (haven't heard them all, just mine) are NOT polite and forgiving sounding and on highly resolving speakers CAN sound clinical.

like i said in another reply... i have a theory that those who prefer "lush sound" are more EMOTIONAL as they always seem to talk about how gear "makes them feel" where speed & detail freaks like myself NEVER talk about how gear feels, but how it sounds. i find it ironic that a troll with a personal axe to grind brings NO FACTS of consequence to the table and uses an emotion based personal attack to try and make a point.

like C+C music facory said...
"things that make you go hmmmm..."

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XF2ayWcJfxo   (Open in New Window)

Edits: 01/06/18