![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Polyester batting substitute posted by Jon Risch on June 17, 2004 at 20:35:11:
Hi There,Thanks once again. I am pretty set now, gonna order those rolls and the other materials I need.
Since the pipe covering is the actual published density, would a pipe of around 40kg/m3 not be effective then? I perceive how yours would be perhaps more effective due to the sheer amount of fiberglass, but what about the pipes filled in the center with loose fiberglass. I am asking now mainly for interest since I have decided to give the SQ&D's a go, but it would be interesting to find out how a 40kg/m3 pipe would perform. Also for some reason the pipe coverings are much cheaper here than fiberglass rolls - about 1/2 the price.
Just one last question - do the plastic bags which cover the fiberglass rolls have another purpose besides containment? Do they act as some form of diffusor/reflector? My room is very lively with a fair amount of echo, so with the rolls simply covered with batting and burlap I believe the bass traps may also aid to HF absorption correct?
Thanks for the help once again. Will let everyone know once my SQ&D's are ready and report the results.
Cheers,
X
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Polyester batting substitute - Xenithon 23:33:00 06/17/04 (5)
- Re: Polyester batting substitute - Xenithon 04:43:16 06/18/04 (4)
- Re: Polyester batting substitute - Xenithon 06:37:33 06/18/04 (3)
- Re: Polyester batting substitute - Jon Risch 10:39:29 06/21/04 (2)
- Thank you for the great help... - Xenithon 11:07:08 06/21/04 (1)
- Re: Thank you for the great help... - Jon Risch 20:52:04 06/21/04 (0)