In Reply to: Your second point neglects the commercial importance of capturing the zeitgeist of the moment posted by DAT on March 9, 2006 at 13:37:57:
any others of their ilk because A) they're not groups; B) they have little serious critical acclaim. It is fashionable to skewer critics but usually a consensus don't dispute the greatness of certain bands but the order of their greatness.
Porcupine and Phish? Don't think so... derivative bands cannot approach anything near greatness.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- My "logic" indeed wouldn't apply to Crow, Brittney, Madonna, or - tinear 17:25:59 03/09/06 (9)
- I think you countered your own argument here - John_the_Scot 02:59:31 03/10/06 (1)
- Phish is Dead wannabes. There's influence, derivation... and - tinear 17:00:15 03/10/06 (0)
- Madonna is generally critically heralded - DAT 19:40:31 03/09/06 (0)
- Re: Dread Zeppelin not great? - J 17:47:29 03/09/06 (5)
- White Stripes: they've made the same cd what, six times now? I lost - tinear 17:06:23 03/10/06 (0)
- Big Star had too much competition at the time and there were tens of - tinear 17:04:47 03/10/06 (3)
- Re: Come on - J 20:16:10 03/10/06 (2)
- Moon Martin crafted and performed great pop songs. If you - tinear 18:30:45 03/11/06 (1)
- You're the one saying acts who do those things break through. Bingo!, you said. Remember? - J 15:27:13 03/12/06 (0)