|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: Me: "An unexplored path to growth." You: "New laws of physics." posted by clarkjohnsen on May 18, 2005 at 16:24:14:
It is another line you wrote:"The Intelligent Chip's action (if true) will change forever our view of the physical realm"
This is what I paraphased as "new laws of physics."
If I paraphrased your words incorrectly, I apologize. At least now your original words are on view and no paraphrase is necessary.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - A sad day on planet audio :( - JustCantBelieveIt 18:58:32 05/16/05 (164)
- I'm amazed this is still a topic of conversation. - Chris_F 09:35:24 05/19/05 (0)
- I don't know, but - KT88 17:12:44 05/17/05 (0)
- "marketing through condescention ".... - feet's too big 15:41:19 05/17/05 (8)
- Re: "marketing through condescention ".... - flickkit 21:41:58 05/17/05 (7)
- Again, this is a very sad situation… - feet's too big 06:03:10 05/18/05 (6)
- Re: Please re-read your post: points b and c in particular; see the self-identity? - Guy 09:04:49 05/18/05 (5)
- Since you ask, no I don't...... - feet's too big 11:16:25 05/18/05 (4)
- Re: Since you ask, no I don't......point b and c again...repeatedly. - Guy 12:02:09 05/18/05 (3)
- Guy, the problem with your attempted sophistry.... - feet's too big 12:37:02 05/18/05 (2)
- Re: I'll just point out when you are personally offensive... - Guy 12:50:30 05/18/05 (1)
- All right, Guy..... For the VERY last time...... - feet's too big 13:48:21 05/18/05 (0)
- Re: A sad day on planet audio :( - Still lots of old school audiophiles out there! 08:34:02 05/17/05 (0)
- Please... For the Love of GOD!!! - SF tech 08:27:07 05/17/05 (0)
- "It's beyond any science currently known." -- Jim Austin - clarkjohnsen 08:14:17 05/17/05 (70)
- I work for... - Jim Austin 08:36:13 05/17/05 (69)
- Well said Jim! NT - lancelot 16:40:08 05/17/05 (0)
- "Invoking the possibility of scientific breakthroughs is an insult to all." - clarkjohnsen 12:14:47 05/17/05 (44)
- physics - tunenut 17:37:53 05/17/05 (20)
- No one claimed that there must in this case be "new laws of physics". You have a straw-man argument. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:42:53 05/18/05 (16)
- straw man - perhaps - tunenut 13:58:04 05/18/05 (6)
- Me: "An unexplored path to growth." You: "New laws of physics." - clarkjohnsen 16:24:14 05/18/05 (5)
- not at all - tunenut 17:13:04 05/18/05 (4)
- Me: "Change our view of the physical realm." You: "New laws of physics." Still LOL! - clarkjohnsen 08:00:39 05/19/05 (3)
- "clearly my intention" - tunenut 08:35:59 05/19/05 (2)
- "Change our view of the physical realm" still does not equate with "New laws of physics." Give it up, pal. - clarkjohnsen 10:55:03 05/19/05 (1)
- I never said that - tunenut 21:18:42 05/19/05 (0)
- I did. And I was right. (nt) - Jim Austin 09:04:48 05/18/05 (8)
- New physics, old physics, the chip works... - Wellfed 12:31:03 05/18/05 (7)
- put your money where your mouth is... - jneutron 13:12:35 05/18/05 (6)
- How about... - Wellfed 14:52:36 05/18/05 (5)
- Better yet.. - jneutron 06:11:23 05/19/05 (4)
- I am working on having a local university test me... - Wellfed 08:00:01 05/19/05 (3)
- Re: I am working on having a local university test me... - jneutron 08:55:35 05/19/05 (2)
- Re: physics - ArlenT 18:01:05 05/17/05 (2)
- Re: physics - jneutron 07:15:05 05/18/05 (0)
- not physics - tunenut 19:09:48 05/17/05 (0)
- Let the record show... - Jim Austin 13:25:09 05/17/05 (21)
- Let the record show that I quoted Mr. Austin VERBATIM and now he tries to diss me. - clarkjohnsen 08:19:53 05/18/05 (17)
- Clark: You're lying - Jim Austin 08:23:56 05/18/05 (16)
- I simply can't see why you continue the personal calumny -- - clarkjohnsen 08:39:42 05/18/05 (15)
- Where is it, Clark? - Jim Austin 09:02:46 05/18/05 (14)
- I included it in the body of the message. Geez Luiz! LOOK AT IT WITH EYES WIDE OPEN. - clarkjohnsen 09:19:10 05/18/05 (5)
- What is written in the body of that message - Jim Austin 09:23:53 05/18/05 (4)
- What is written in the subject line of that message was EXACTLY what was written in the body. Your false accusations... - clarkjohnsen 10:19:13 05/18/05 (3)
- Re: What is written in the subject line of that message was EXACTLY what was written in the body. Your false accusations - Steve Eddy 12:06:17 05/18/05 (1)
- That's pure rubbish. Plus, look at the first sentence of the post. It's all his. Begone. nt - clarkjohnsen 16:08:50 05/18/05 (0)
- Defending a crackpot, bogus, obvious audio tweak by invoking the possibility of scientific breakthroughs is an insult to - jneutron 10:47:51 05/18/05 (0)
- Re: Where is it, Clark? - Steve Eddy 09:16:56 05/18/05 (7)
- Re: "Where is THE APOLOGY, Clark?" should read the question. - Guy 09:58:40 05/18/05 (6)
- He did quote the sentence, in context... - Wellfed 13:05:28 05/18/05 (5)
- Yes, I know... - Jim Austin 13:28:07 05/18/05 (4)
- Re: Yes, I know... - john curl 17:11:50 05/18/05 (1)
- I've been waiting for that one... - Jim Austin 17:28:59 05/18/05 (0)
- Re: Yes, I know...additionally it's an Attention-graber. - Guy 13:38:31 05/18/05 (1)
- "Attention-grabber."..well, what do you expect from a writer? If no headlines, make them..nt - jneutron 13:43:38 05/18/05 (0)
- "incapable of honest, serious debate" - pconr 13:46:44 05/17/05 (2)
- I consider it to be an irrational view... - Wellfed 12:54:04 05/18/05 (1)
- Re: I consider it to be an irrational view... - pconr 18:35:59 05/18/05 (0)
- There *are* scientific breakthroughs... - jbmcb 12:36:29 05/17/05 (0)
- Degrees - jbmcb 11:56:53 05/17/05 (0)
- Bravo - norfish 10:29:27 05/17/05 (1)
- Please notice... - Jim Austin 13:30:44 05/17/05 (0)
- Re: I work for... - Soundmind 10:29:01 05/17/05 (19)
- Have you ever read Stereophile ? - michaelb 12:48:03 05/17/05 (1)
- Re: Have you ever read Stereophile ? - Soundmind 15:53:40 05/17/05 (0)
- Re: I work for... - drew 11:26:23 05/17/05 (9)
- Re: I work for... - Soundmind 13:03:23 05/17/05 (8)
- Re: I work for... - Drew 14:44:29 05/17/05 (7)
- Re: I work for... - Soundmind 15:54:59 05/17/05 (6)
- Re: I work for... - D 16:37:13 05/17/05 (5)
- Emerson, the giant killer, heh, heh nt. - Frank E 11:37:28 05/18/05 (0)
- Re: I work for... - Soundmind 04:58:09 05/18/05 (3)
- no i wouldn't... - robert young 09:23:29 05/18/05 (2)
- Spoken like a truely worried Jadis CD player owner nt - Soundmind 13:34:35 05/18/05 (1)
- not a chance... - robert young 03:46:15 05/19/05 (0)
- Re: I work for... - norfish 10:35:50 05/17/05 (6)
- Re: I work for... - Soundmind 11:12:10 05/17/05 (5)
- Philosophy of science - Jim Austin 11:55:40 05/17/05 (4)
- Nonsense - Soundmind 14:29:49 05/17/05 (3)
- No, not nonsense - Jim Austin 15:13:50 05/17/05 (2)
- I'm not sure where to post this... - Jack Gribble 21:20:16 05/17/05 (1)
- Re: I'm not sure where to post this... - Soundmind 05:18:53 05/18/05 (0)
- In regards to the man who designed... - unclestu52 23:33:26 05/16/05 (1)
- Re: In regards to the man who designed... - Steve Eddy 00:04:05 05/17/05 (0)
- Lots of good amps - Jefe 22:27:25 05/16/05 (5)
- Re: Lots of good amps - TommyK 14:25:52 05/17/05 (0)
- Except he can design a good amp - michaelb 10:12:38 05/17/05 (0)
- Re: Lots of good amps - john curl 23:33:53 05/16/05 (2)
- Thanks for showing your true colors - Jefe 07:51:38 05/17/05 (1)
- I'm sorry folks are piling on JC, but... - Jim Austin 08:00:04 05/17/05 (0)
- Re: A sad day on planet audio :( - Jim Austin 20:14:48 05/16/05 (1)
- great article, Jim - Alex S 20:23:09 05/16/05 (0)
- Here's JC's post - Jim Austin 20:01:23 05/16/05 (0)
- Best to not judge John Curl's - warnerwh 19:59:10 05/16/05 (69)
- Re: Best to not judge John Curl's - May Belt 09:19:17 05/17/05 (5)
- Re: May Belt... - Guy 10:56:22 05/18/05 (2)
- Re: May Belt... - May Belt 12:49:18 05/18/05 (1)
- Re: May Belt.. - Guy 12:56:00 05/18/05 (0)
- "Jim believes [in] strict physical conventional electronic or acoustic theories." Exactly! - clarkjohnsen 12:50:02 05/17/05 (0)
- It's true that I don't believe in magic - Jim Austin 09:59:02 05/17/05 (0)
- Re: Best to not judge John Curl's - john curl 22:42:29 05/16/05 (62)
- Why make tweek that can't be heard on average system?? - Robert Hamel 10:37:19 05/17/05 (13)
- Re: What's "average?" - geoffkait 05:49:09 05/18/05 (0)
- I can hear the effect on my $190 kitchen Sony system. Which, by the way... - clarkjohnsen 11:36:22 05/17/05 (11)
- Clark, tell us what that $190 system is. I'd be interested in getting one if they're still making it. nt - JimL 14:05:01 05/17/05 (7)
- NB: This newer system... - clarkjohnsen 16:07:31 05/18/05 (3)
- Could your system be the MHCGX450? Description sounds similar, also price. nt - JimL 19:12:57 05/19/05 (1)
- That most surely is it. In addition... - clarkjohnsen 10:21:08 05/20/05 (0)
- Or, maybe if you provide the original model number I can scrounge around for a used one. nt - JimL 11:32:21 05/19/05 (0)
- Here ya go. - clarkjohnsen 08:32:47 05/18/05 (2)
- Thanks, Clark. nt - JimL 11:18:04 05/19/05 (0)
- did you mean spring for the extra $125? - jneutron 11:18:01 05/18/05 (0)
- Well if that's the case it will work for "Joe Sixpack" - Robert Hamel 12:33:51 05/17/05 (1)
- "What's wrong with beer anyway??" It makes you gross. - clarkjohnsen 13:13:19 05/17/05 (0)
- Your "Double-Wide" in Arkansas awaits you;-) nt - Ivan303 12:08:38 05/17/05 (0)
- Hmm. I may be interpreting your post incorrectly. Are you implying that...... - Rick W 07:34:04 05/17/05 (1)
- I think he's saying - Rodney Gold 09:51:02 05/17/05 (0)
- Re: Best to not judge John Curl's - Jack Seaton 06:49:27 05/17/05 (0)
- Re: Best to not judge John Curl's - Steve Eddy 23:55:03 05/16/05 (44)
- Analyzing the chip - KlausR. 04:17:09 05/17/05 (43)
- "Worthless when you want to provide solid evidence." - clarkjohnsen 08:06:35 05/17/05 (42)
- I fully agree with you... - KlausR. 10:22:07 05/17/05 (6)
- "Obviously it's not you." Actually I'm one of the few who do. Remember? - clarkjohnsen 11:25:52 05/17/05 (5)
- ""You weren't interested in the truth.""...LOL, you mean....your version?nt - jneutron 12:05:32 05/17/05 (4)
- I told him -- and I tell you -- the truth. That it did not set you free... - clarkjohnsen 12:35:11 05/17/05 (3)
- your "truth"...you crack me up..you've provided nothing of substance.just denigration.nt - jneutron 13:02:17 05/17/05 (2)
- Denigration? What do you call Klaus' "Obviously it's not you" remark? - clarkjohnsen 13:15:50 05/17/05 (1)
- Consistent with your postings..."surely, I heard it...I can't be wrong'..nt - jneutron 13:24:35 05/17/05 (0)
- Re: "Worthless when you want to provide solid evidence." - Sue Kraft 10:13:00 05/17/05 (12)
- "the transport in my CD player wasn't level" - BS64 12:48:39 05/17/05 (0)
- Who told you that? nt - clarkjohnsen 11:22:01 05/17/05 (10)
- Geoff Kait - Sue Kraft 12:08:10 05/17/05 (9)
- Did he explain why? - KlausR. 00:08:11 05/18/05 (1)
- No - Sue Kraft 04:59:43 05/18/05 (0)
- Re: Geoff Kait - Steve Eddy 20:46:25 05/17/05 (0)
- I'll let him answer that, but Damn! he never told *me*. nt - clarkjohnsen 12:32:02 05/17/05 (5)
- Don't you purveyors of "truth" talk to one another???nt - jneutron 13:04:25 05/17/05 (4)
- Re: Did Hirohito and Hitler talk to one another? Answer made. - Guy 07:06:35 05/18/05 (3)
- Perhaps those references are better left on the cutting room floor?.. - jneutron 07:18:47 05/18/05 (2)
- It was a playful joust: that 'sinister forces' work solo. No offense met. - Guy 10:01:32 05/18/05 (1)
- that 'sinister forces' work solo. - jneutron 11:21:48 05/18/05 (0)
- Re: A question for Mr. Johnsen...and please be straight-up... - Guy 08:55:47 05/17/05 (3)
- Re: Mr. Johnsen, I'm overjoyed to respond... - Guy 10:07:59 05/18/05 (0)
- I see you haven't replied... I gave you the courtesy...nt - clarkjohnsen 08:50:54 05/18/05 (0)
- No such thing as a 10X improvement in sound. For a more reasoned example... - clarkjohnsen 11:30:05 05/17/05 (0)
- "Life is too full of interesting things to do." - Jim Austin 08:41:49 05/17/05 (12)
- Here ya go, Jim... - Steve Eddy 10:18:09 05/17/05 (10)
- laughed so hard I soiled the armor... nt - TommyK 14:12:53 05/17/05 (0)
- That could well be me right now... - Jim Austin 12:12:21 05/17/05 (8)
- Re: That could well be me right now... - Steve Eddy 12:42:30 05/17/05 (7)
- I wish I hadn't see that... - Wellfed 13:45:27 05/17/05 (2)
- Re: I wish I hadn't see that... - Steve Eddy 14:30:21 05/17/05 (1)
- I panicked there for a moment, my appetite is quickly returning... - Wellfed 14:44:42 05/17/05 (0)
- What the heck IS THAT???? - Jim Austin 13:29:12 05/17/05 (3)
- Re: What the heck IS THAT???? - Steve Eddy 14:28:34 05/17/05 (2)
- Art, I'm guessing... - Jim Austin 17:07:17 05/17/05 (1)
- Re: Art, I'm guessing... - Steve Eddy 18:43:29 05/17/05 (0)
- Re: "Life is too full of interesting things to do." - Steve Eddy 09:06:49 05/17/05 (0)
- ""a bunch of ninnies too scared to listen for themselves""..you crack me up.nt - jneutron 08:37:37 05/17/05 (4)
- I think it is. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:31:21 05/17/05 (0)
- For most folks it isn't a question of fear ... nt - Jack Seaton 10:55:21 05/17/05 (2)
- exactly - BS64 11:36:37 05/17/05 (1)
- Re: exactly - jneutron 12:12:41 05/17/05 (0)
Follow Ups
- not at all - tunenut 17:13:04 05/18/05 (4)
- Me: "Change our view of the physical realm." You: "New laws of physics." Still LOL! - clarkjohnsen 08:00:39 05/19/05 (3)
- "clearly my intention" - tunenut 08:35:59 05/19/05 (2)
- "Change our view of the physical realm" still does not equate with "New laws of physics." Give it up, pal. - clarkjohnsen 10:55:03 05/19/05 (1)
- I never said that - tunenut 21:18:42 05/19/05 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]