Please... For the Love of GOD!!! - SF tech

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - A sad day on planet audio :( - JustCantBelieveIt 18:58:32 05/16/05 (164)

I'm amazed this is still a topic of conversation. - Chris_F 09:35:24 05/19/05 (0)

I don't know, but - KT88 17:12:44 05/17/05 (0)

"marketing through condescention ".... - feet's too big 15:41:19 05/17/05 (8)

Re: "marketing through condescention ".... - flickkit 21:41:58 05/17/05 (7)

Again, this is a very sad situationâ€¦ - feet's too big 06:03:10 05/18/05 (6)

Re: Please re-read your post: points b and c in particular; see the self-identity? - Guy 09:04:49 05/18/05 (5)

Since you ask, no I don't...... - feet's too big 11:16:25 05/18/05 (4)

Re: Since you ask, no I don't......point b and c again...repeatedly. - Guy 12:02:09 05/18/05 (3)

Guy, the problem with your attempted sophistry.... - feet's too big 12:37:02 05/18/05 (2)

Re: I'll just point out when you are personally offensive... - Guy 12:50:30 05/18/05 (1)

All right, Guy..... For the VERY last time...... - feet's too big 13:48:21 05/18/05 (0)

Re: A sad day on planet audio :( - Still lots of old school audiophiles out there! 08:34:02 05/17/05 (0)

Please... For the Love of GOD!!! - SF tech 08:27:07 05/17/05 (0)

"It's beyond any science currently known." -- Jim Austin - clarkjohnsen 08:14:17 05/17/05 (70)

I work for... - Jim Austin 08:36:13 05/17/05 (69)

Well said Jim! NT - lancelot 16:40:08 05/17/05 (0)

"Invoking the possibility of scientific breakthroughs is an insult to all." - clarkjohnsen 12:14:47 05/17/05 (44)

physics - tunenut 17:37:53 05/17/05 (20)

No one claimed that there must in this case be "new laws of physics". You have a straw-man argument. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:42:53 05/18/05 (16)

straw man - perhaps - tunenut 13:58:04 05/18/05 (6)

Me: "An unexplored path to growth." You: "New laws of physics." - clarkjohnsen 16:24:14 05/18/05 (5)

not at all - tunenut 17:13:04 05/18/05 (4)

Me: "Change our view of the physical realm." You: "New laws of physics." Still LOL! - clarkjohnsen 08:00:39 05/19/05 (3)

"clearly my intention" - tunenut 08:35:59 05/19/05 (2)

"Change our view of the physical realm" still does not equate with "New laws of physics." Give it up, pal. - clarkjohnsen 10:55:03 05/19/05 (1)

I never said that - tunenut 21:18:42 05/19/05 (0)

I did. And I was right. (nt) - Jim Austin 09:04:48 05/18/05 (8)

New physics, old physics, the chip works... - Wellfed 12:31:03 05/18/05 (7)

put your money where your mouth is... - jneutron 13:12:35 05/18/05 (6)

How about... - Wellfed 14:52:36 05/18/05 (5)

Better yet.. - jneutron 06:11:23 05/19/05 (4)

I am working on having a local university test me... - Wellfed 08:00:01 05/19/05 (3)

Re: I am working on having a local university test me... - jneutron 08:55:35 05/19/05 (2)

?... - Wellfed 11:33:29 05/19/05 (1)

Re: ?... - jneutron 11:39:11 05/19/05 (0)

Re: physics - ArlenT 18:01:05 05/17/05 (2)

Re: physics - jneutron 07:15:05 05/18/05 (0)

not physics - tunenut 19:09:48 05/17/05 (0)

Let the record show... - Jim Austin 13:25:09 05/17/05 (21)

Let the record show that I quoted Mr. Austin VERBATIM and now he tries to diss me. - clarkjohnsen 08:19:53 05/18/05 (17)

Clark: You're lying - Jim Austin 08:23:56 05/18/05 (16)

I simply can't see why you continue the personal calumny -- - clarkjohnsen 08:39:42 05/18/05 (15)

Where is it, Clark? - Jim Austin 09:02:46 05/18/05 (14)

I included it in the body of the message. Geez Luiz! LOOK AT IT WITH EYES WIDE OPEN. - clarkjohnsen 09:19:10 05/18/05 (5)

What is written in the body of that message - Jim Austin 09:23:53 05/18/05 (4)

What is written in the subject line of that message was EXACTLY what was written in the body. Your false accusations... - clarkjohnsen 10:19:13 05/18/05 (3)

Re: What is written in the subject line of that message was EXACTLY what was written in the body. Your false accusations - Steve Eddy 12:06:17 05/18/05 (1)

That's pure rubbish. Plus, look at the first sentence of the post. It's all his. Begone. nt - clarkjohnsen 16:08:50 05/18/05 (0)

Defending a crackpot, bogus, obvious audio tweak by invoking the possibility of scientific breakthroughs is an insult to - jneutron 10:47:51 05/18/05 (0)

Re: Where is it, Clark? - Steve Eddy 09:16:56 05/18/05 (7)

Re: "Where is THE APOLOGY, Clark?" should read the question. - Guy 09:58:40 05/18/05 (6)

He did quote the sentence, in context... - Wellfed 13:05:28 05/18/05 (5)

Yes, I know... - Jim Austin 13:28:07 05/18/05 (4)

Re: Yes, I know... - john curl 17:11:50 05/18/05 (1)

I've been waiting for that one... - Jim Austin 17:28:59 05/18/05 (0)

Re: Yes, I know...additionally it's an Attention-graber. - Guy 13:38:31 05/18/05 (1)

"Attention-grabber."..well, what do you expect from a writer? If no headlines, make them..nt - jneutron 13:43:38 05/18/05 (0)

"incapable of honest, serious debate" - pconr 13:46:44 05/17/05 (2)

I consider it to be an irrational view... - Wellfed 12:54:04 05/18/05 (1)

Re: I consider it to be an irrational view... - pconr 18:35:59 05/18/05 (0)

There *are* scientific breakthroughs... - jbmcb 12:36:29 05/17/05 (0)

Degrees - jbmcb 11:56:53 05/17/05 (0)

Bravo - norfish 10:29:27 05/17/05 (1)

Please notice... - Jim Austin 13:30:44 05/17/05 (0)

Re: I work for... - Soundmind 10:29:01 05/17/05 (19)

Have you ever read Stereophile ? - michaelb 12:48:03 05/17/05 (1)

Re: Have you ever read Stereophile ? - Soundmind 15:53:40 05/17/05 (0)

Re: I work for... - drew 11:26:23 05/17/05 (9)

Re: I work for... - Soundmind 13:03:23 05/17/05 (8)

Re: I work for... - Drew 14:44:29 05/17/05 (7)

Re: I work for... - Soundmind 15:54:59 05/17/05 (6)

Re: I work for... - D 16:37:13 05/17/05 (5)

Emerson, the giant killer, heh, heh nt. - Frank E 11:37:28 05/18/05 (0)

Re: I work for... - Soundmind 04:58:09 05/18/05 (3)

no i wouldn't... - robert young 09:23:29 05/18/05 (2)

Spoken like a truely worried Jadis CD player owner nt - Soundmind 13:34:35 05/18/05 (1)

not a chance... - robert young 03:46:15 05/19/05 (0)

Re: I work for... - norfish 10:35:50 05/17/05 (6)

Re: I work for... - Soundmind 11:12:10 05/17/05 (5)

Philosophy of science - Jim Austin 11:55:40 05/17/05 (4)

Nonsense - Soundmind 14:29:49 05/17/05 (3)

No, not nonsense - Jim Austin 15:13:50 05/17/05 (2)

I'm not sure where to post this... - Jack Gribble 21:20:16 05/17/05 (1)

Re: I'm not sure where to post this... - Soundmind 05:18:53 05/18/05 (0)

In regards to the man who designed... - unclestu52 23:33:26 05/16/05 (1)

Re: In regards to the man who designed... - Steve Eddy 00:04:05 05/17/05 (0)

Lots of good amps - Jefe 22:27:25 05/16/05 (5)

Re: Lots of good amps - TommyK 14:25:52 05/17/05 (0)

Except he can design a good amp - michaelb 10:12:38 05/17/05 (0)

Re: Lots of good amps - john curl 23:33:53 05/16/05 (2)

Thanks for showing your true colors - Jefe 07:51:38 05/17/05 (1)

I'm sorry folks are piling on JC, but... - Jim Austin 08:00:04 05/17/05 (0)

Re: A sad day on planet audio :( - Jim Austin 20:14:48 05/16/05 (1)

great article, Jim - Alex S 20:23:09 05/16/05 (0)

Here's JC's post - Jim Austin 20:01:23 05/16/05 (0)

Best to not judge John Curl's - warnerwh 19:59:10 05/16/05 (69)

Re: Best to not judge John Curl's - May Belt 09:19:17 05/17/05 (5)

Re: May Belt... - Guy 10:56:22 05/18/05 (2)

Re: May Belt... - May Belt 12:49:18 05/18/05 (1)

Re: May Belt.. - Guy 12:56:00 05/18/05 (0)

"Jim believes [in] strict physical conventional electronic or acoustic theories." Exactly! - clarkjohnsen 12:50:02 05/17/05 (0)

It's true that I don't believe in magic - Jim Austin 09:59:02 05/17/05 (0)

Re: Best to not judge John Curl's - john curl 22:42:29 05/16/05 (62)

Why make tweek that can't be heard on average system?? - Robert Hamel 10:37:19 05/17/05 (13)

Re: What's "average?" - geoffkait 05:49:09 05/18/05 (0)

I can hear the effect on my $190 kitchen Sony system. Which, by the way... - clarkjohnsen 11:36:22 05/17/05 (11)

Clark, tell us what that $190 system is. I'd be interested in getting one if they're still making it. nt - JimL 14:05:01 05/17/05 (7)

NB: This newer system... - clarkjohnsen 16:07:31 05/18/05 (3)

Could your system be the MHCGX450? Description sounds similar, also price. nt - JimL 19:12:57 05/19/05 (1)

That most surely is it. In addition... - clarkjohnsen 10:21:08 05/20/05 (0)

Or, maybe if you provide the original model number I can scrounge around for a used one. nt - JimL 11:32:21 05/19/05 (0)

Here ya go. - clarkjohnsen 08:32:47 05/18/05 (2)

Thanks, Clark. nt - JimL 11:18:04 05/19/05 (0)

did you mean spring for the extra $125? - jneutron 11:18:01 05/18/05 (0)

Well if that's the case it will work for "Joe Sixpack" - Robert Hamel 12:33:51 05/17/05 (1)

"What's wrong with beer anyway??" It makes you gross. - clarkjohnsen 13:13:19 05/17/05 (0)

Your "Double-Wide" in Arkansas awaits you;-) nt - Ivan303 12:08:38 05/17/05 (0)

Hmm. I may be interpreting your post incorrectly. Are you implying that...... - Rick W 07:34:04 05/17/05 (1)

I think he's saying - Rodney Gold 09:51:02 05/17/05 (0)

Re: Best to not judge John Curl's - Jack Seaton 06:49:27 05/17/05 (0)

Re: Best to not judge John Curl's - Steve Eddy 23:55:03 05/16/05 (44)

Analyzing the chip - KlausR. 04:17:09 05/17/05 (43)

"Worthless when you want to provide solid evidence." - clarkjohnsen 08:06:35 05/17/05 (42)

I fully agree with you... - KlausR. 10:22:07 05/17/05 (6)

"Obviously it's not you." Actually I'm one of the few who do. Remember? - clarkjohnsen 11:25:52 05/17/05 (5)

""You weren't interested in the truth.""...LOL, you mean....your version?nt - jneutron 12:05:32 05/17/05 (4)

I told him -- and I tell you -- the truth. That it did not set you free... - clarkjohnsen 12:35:11 05/17/05 (3)

your "truth"...you crack me up..you've provided nothing of substance.just denigration.nt - jneutron 13:02:17 05/17/05 (2)

Denigration? What do you call Klaus' "Obviously it's not you" remark? - clarkjohnsen 13:15:50 05/17/05 (1)

Consistent with your postings..."surely, I heard it...I can't be wrong'..nt - jneutron 13:24:35 05/17/05 (0)

Re: "Worthless when you want to provide solid evidence." - Sue Kraft 10:13:00 05/17/05 (12)

"the transport in my CD player wasn't level" - BS64 12:48:39 05/17/05 (0)

Who told you that? nt - clarkjohnsen 11:22:01 05/17/05 (10)

Geoff Kait - Sue Kraft 12:08:10 05/17/05 (9)

Did he explain why? - KlausR. 00:08:11 05/18/05 (1)

No - Sue Kraft 04:59:43 05/18/05 (0)

Re: Geoff Kait - Steve Eddy 20:46:25 05/17/05 (0)

I'll let him answer that, but Damn! he never told *me*. nt - clarkjohnsen 12:32:02 05/17/05 (5)

Don't you purveyors of "truth" talk to one another???nt - jneutron 13:04:25 05/17/05 (4)

Re: Did Hirohito and Hitler talk to one another? Answer made. - Guy 07:06:35 05/18/05 (3)

Perhaps those references are better left on the cutting room floor?.. - jneutron 07:18:47 05/18/05 (2)

It was a playful joust: that 'sinister forces' work solo. No offense met. - Guy 10:01:32 05/18/05 (1)

that 'sinister forces' work solo. - jneutron 11:21:48 05/18/05 (0)

Re: A question for Mr. Johnsen...and please be straight-up... - Guy 08:55:47 05/17/05 (3)

Re: Mr. Johnsen, I'm overjoyed to respond... - Guy 10:07:59 05/18/05 (0)

I see you haven't replied... I gave you the courtesy...nt - clarkjohnsen 08:50:54 05/18/05 (0)

No such thing as a 10X improvement in sound. For a more reasoned example... - clarkjohnsen 11:30:05 05/17/05 (0)

"Life is too full of interesting things to do." - Jim Austin 08:41:49 05/17/05 (12)

Here ya go, Jim... - Steve Eddy 10:18:09 05/17/05 (10)

laughed so hard I soiled the armor... nt - TommyK 14:12:53 05/17/05 (0)

That could well be me right now... - Jim Austin 12:12:21 05/17/05 (8)

Re: That could well be me right now... - Steve Eddy 12:42:30 05/17/05 (7)

I wish I hadn't see that... - Wellfed 13:45:27 05/17/05 (2)

Re: I wish I hadn't see that... - Steve Eddy 14:30:21 05/17/05 (1)

I panicked there for a moment, my appetite is quickly returning... - Wellfed 14:44:42 05/17/05 (0)

What the heck IS THAT???? - Jim Austin 13:29:12 05/17/05 (3)

Re: What the heck IS THAT???? - Steve Eddy 14:28:34 05/17/05 (2)

Art, I'm guessing... - Jim Austin 17:07:17 05/17/05 (1)

Re: Art, I'm guessing... - Steve Eddy 18:43:29 05/17/05 (0)

Re: "Life is too full of interesting things to do." - Steve Eddy 09:06:49 05/17/05 (0)

""a bunch of ninnies too scared to listen for themselves""..you crack me up.nt - jneutron 08:37:37 05/17/05 (4)

I think it is. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:31:21 05/17/05 (0)

For most folks it isn't a question of fear ... nt - Jack Seaton 10:55:21 05/17/05 (2)

exactly - BS64 11:36:37 05/17/05 (1)

Re: exactly - jneutron 12:12:41 05/17/05 (0)

Follow Ups

Please... For the Love of GOD!!! - SF tech 08:27:07 05/17/05 (0)