Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - High-performance coax SPDIF modification for a Cambridge CXC V2 CD transport - Leo loves music 17:22:44 04/26/25 (21)

• the result - Leo loves music 18:55:04 04/30/25 (1)
• The TASCAM CD-200 - Leo loves music 14:18:00 05/03/25 (0)
• RE: High-performance coax SPDIF modification for a Cambridge CXC V2 CD transport - Lord Whimsey 13:26:31 04/27/25 (0)
• What does 'high performance' mean in this context? (Nt) - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 12:10:07 04/27/25 (16)
• high performance = higher-quality signal transfer = better SQ - Leo loves music 13:38:17 04/27/25 (11)
• RE: high performance = higher-quality signal transfer = better SQ - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 18:33:50 04/27/25 (7)
• RE: high performance = higher-quality signal transfer = better SQ - Leo loves music 18:51:18 04/27/25 (6)
• RE: high performance = higher-quality signal transfer = better SQ - AbeCollins 19:33:49 04/27/25 (5)
• RE: high performance = higher-quality signal transfer = better SQ - Leo loves music 19:45:52 04/27/25 (4)
• Your stock SPDIF output was essentially broken.... - AbeCollins 20:19:06 04/27/25 (3)
• RE: Your stock SPDIF output was essentially broken.... - Leo loves music 20:26:32 04/27/25 (2)
• Some audiophile gear can do that too..... - AbeCollins 20:48:18 04/27/25 (1)
• RE: Some audiophile gear can do that too..... - Leo loves music 02:19:40 04/28/25 (0)
• That begs the question - E-Stat 16:19:44 04/27/25 (2)
• Flaky SPDIF can degrade SQ - AbeCollins 18:25:46 04/27/25 (1)
• Sure - E-Stat 06:11:07 04/28/25 (0)
• Could mean within the SPDIF spec ?? - AbeCollins 13:19:00 04/27/25 (0)
• I wonder - E-Stat 12:23:39 04/27/25 (2)
• RE: I wonder - Leo loves music 13:24:52 04/27/25 (1)
• Ok - E-Stat 13:26:28 04/27/25 (0)
• RE: High-performance coax SPDIF modification for a Cambridge CXC V2 CD transport - AbeCollins 20:57:19 04/26/25 (0)

Follow Ups

• That begs the question - E-Stat 16:19:44 04/27/25 (2)
• Flaky SPDIF can degrade SQ - AbeCollins 18:25:46 04/27/25 (1)
• Sure - E-Stat 06:11:07 04/28/25 (0)