In Reply to: RE: So are you an absolutist? posted by morricab on June 17, 2024 at 02:44:19:
You call his conclusion "wishy washy" but I would characterize it as less dogmatic.
You know, this whole discussion started when a few posters seemed to get triggered when Amir and Audio Science Review were brought up (not by me I might add!). As I've said all along, people have the right to their beliefs and perceptions - even though these perceptions may (and do!) change from day to day (as Geddes pointed out!).
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Thanks for the link to the Nelson Pass article - Chris from Lafayette 10:58:32 06/17/24 (11)
- RE: Thanks for the link to the Nelson Pass article - morricab 01:05:58 06/18/24 (10)
- As previously observed - E-Stat 15:35:02 06/18/24 (7)
- Bum rap again! - Chris from Lafayette 11:23:34 06/19/24 (6)
- Your challenge is - E-Stat 16:38:42 06/19/24 (5)
- No, YOUR challenge is not to be star struck by. . . - Chris from Lafayette 17:19:58 06/23/24 (1)
- Too funny! - E-Stat 18:05:34 06/23/24 (0)
- RE: Your challenge is - morricab 03:53:47 06/20/24 (2)
- I'm sorry for the two of you, but the critical observation Geddes made. . . - Chris from Lafayette 17:02:12 06/23/24 (1)
- RE: I'm sorry for the two of you, but the critical observation Geddes made. . . - morricab 02:58:14 06/28/24 (0)
- Taken to its logical conclusion, your point would mean. . . - Chris from Lafayette 11:14:47 06/18/24 (1)
- RE: Taken to its logical conclusion, your point would mean. . . - morricab 04:03:07 06/20/24 (0)