In Reply to: RE: So IOW, it's just as I suggested? posted by morricab on June 13, 2024 at 01:22:02:
. . . to have deleterious effects on the sound quality. I also believe that this approach to design has ebbed quite a bit over the decades and is thus not as relevant to the discussion today as it may have been in the past.
As for "bad" recordings, it would help if you could name actual recordings which suffer from the problems you list, rather than stating generalizations.
BTW, is this the Geddes you mean (at the link below)? This particular Geddes says things like the following:I have always thought that if someone's measurements do not "tell the whole story" then they are the wrong measurements. Technology has simply come too far to believe that "there are things that we cannot measure." I have also never believed that all that matters is "how it sounds," because this is such an unstable and personal opinion. Sound quality opinions can and will differ from person to person, system to system and most importantly even within the same person on different days (as I said before, I have personally witnessed this in well regarded "reviewers"). Personal preferences have such a low stability as to be an almost completely pointless thing to stake a claim to. "Hi-Fi" does not mean "pleasant" - it means "accurate"; accuracy, as opposed to preference, is absolutely quantifiable and extremely stable - as stable as I care to control in my lab from day to day or test to test (but in any case its uncertainty is easy to quantify and understand). Decisions based on accuracy are therefore much more likely to be valid than decisions based on "how it sounds." I do not see how one could ever support a position that "preference" trumps "accuracy." That's simply taking a giant step backwards in the evolution of Hi-Fi.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I agree that huge amounts of negative feedback are generally considered. . . . . . - Chris from Lafayette 11:01:35 06/13/24 (42)
- RE: I agree that huge amounts of negative feedback are generally considered. . . . . . - morricab 02:25:38 06/17/24 (0)
- Yep - E-Stat 07:07:54 06/14/24 (40)
- So are you an absolutist? - Chris from Lafayette 11:41:34 06/14/24 (39)
- RE: So are you an absolutist? - morricab 02:44:19 06/17/24 (12)
- Thanks for the link to the Nelson Pass article - Chris from Lafayette 10:58:32 06/17/24 (11)
- RE: Thanks for the link to the Nelson Pass article - morricab 01:05:58 06/18/24 (10)
- As previously observed - E-Stat 15:35:02 06/18/24 (7)
- Bum rap again! - Chris from Lafayette 11:23:34 06/19/24 (6)
- Your challenge is - E-Stat 16:38:42 06/19/24 (5)
- No, YOUR challenge is not to be star struck by. . . - Chris from Lafayette 17:19:58 06/23/24 (1)
- Too funny! - E-Stat 18:05:34 06/23/24 (0)
- RE: Your challenge is - morricab 03:53:47 06/20/24 (2)
- I'm sorry for the two of you, but the critical observation Geddes made. . . - Chris from Lafayette 17:02:12 06/23/24 (1)
- RE: I'm sorry for the two of you, but the critical observation Geddes made. . . - morricab 02:58:14 06/28/24 (0)
- Taken to its logical conclusion, your point would mean. . . - Chris from Lafayette 11:14:47 06/18/24 (1)
- RE: Taken to its logical conclusion, your point would mean. . . - morricab 04:03:07 06/20/24 (0)
- Just a music lover - E-Stat 12:37:24 06/14/24 (25)
- Bum rap alert! - Chris from Lafayette 14:36:31 06/14/24 (16)
- RE: Bum rap alert! - E-Stat 14:50:20 06/14/24 (15)
- RE: Bum rap alert! - Chris from Lafayette 15:11:59 06/14/24 (14)
- RE: Bum rap alert! - E-Stat 15:26:06 06/14/24 (13)
- That's a non sequitur - yet another bum rap - Chris from Lafayette 00:47:23 06/15/24 (12)
- RE: That's a non sequitur - yet another bum rap - morricab 04:10:11 06/17/24 (11)
- What correlation are you talking about? - Chris from Lafayette 11:06:55 06/18/24 (0)
- Absolutely! - E-Stat 16:38:21 06/17/24 (3)
- Yeah - except that THD is only one measurement among many, and. . . - Chris from Lafayette 11:03:38 06/18/24 (2)
- RE: Yeah - except that THD is only one measurement among many, and. . . - morricab 04:06:54 06/20/24 (0)
- Just an utterly useless one! -nt - E-Stat 11:25:34 06/18/24 (0)
- But if that's true, then why does he say what he did in the interview. . . - Chris from Lafayette 10:39:08 06/17/24 (5)
- RE: But if that's true, then why does he say what he did in the interview. . . - morricab 01:11:06 06/18/24 (4)
- Your claim is completely incompatible with his statement - Chris from Lafayette 11:34:34 06/19/24 (3)
- RE: Your claim is completely incompatible with his statement - morricab 03:08:42 06/20/24 (2)
- I think GedLee did his best work in Rush - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 12:02:45 06/20/24 (1)
- RE: I think GedLee did his best work in Rush - morricab 05:45:55 06/21/24 (0)
- SINAD denier, stop the steal! - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 12:46:29 06/14/24 (7)
- Too funny! - E-Stat 13:49:45 06/14/24 (6)
- Too funny is right! - Chris from Lafayette 14:40:08 06/14/24 (5)
- RE: Too funny is right! - morricab 04:11:06 06/17/24 (4)
- Yes - I agree with that! - Chris from Lafayette 10:36:05 06/17/24 (3)
- RE: Yes - I agree with that! - morricab 01:28:01 06/18/24 (2)
- RE: Yes - I agree with that! - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 18:51:20 06/18/24 (1)
- RE: Yes - I agree with that! - morricab 03:48:43 06/20/24 (0)