RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm

Posted by John Elison (A) on October 10, 2007 at 06:36:58

In Reply to: RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm posted by Audio Fan on October 10, 2007 at 04:50:59:

> Lots of people used Ortofon 2000's in high mass arms with no problem.

I'm talking about the original MC-2000, which was high-compliance and designed specifically for the SME Series III tonearm.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm - Audio Fan 10:03:51 10/09/07 (12)

RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm - charlies824 10:56:32 10/09/07 (11)

RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm - John Elison 13:47:24 10/09/07 (9)

RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm - charlies824 14:28:28 10/09/07 (1)

You were right: lateral resonance freq = 10 Hz nt - charlies824 13:04:08 10/11/07 (0)

RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm - Audio Fan 13:51:14 10/09/07 (6)

RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm - John Elison 17:35:36 10/09/07 (2)

RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm - Audio Fan 04:50:59 10/10/07 (1)

RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm - John Elison 06:36:58 10/10/07 (0)

it is probably what they have overstock on and - mattjk 14:58:48 10/09/07 (2)

RE: it is probably what they have overstock on and - Audio Fan 16:01:38 10/09/07 (1)

of course, how many tables out there can actually - mattjk 16:20:45 10/09/07 (0)

RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm - Audio Fan 12:22:20 10/09/07 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm - John Elison 06:36:58 10/10/07 (0)

RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm

Post a Message!