In Reply to: RE: other posters said it was no good, so it was in question. posted by Tre' on September 28, 2017 at 20:47:32:
Yes, at twice the price. He states in his article that the hammond is his budget opt of choice. My whole point is that for me it isn't worth the higher price for the extra 5% I might get in sound. It's a cost/benefit analysis on my part. I'm on a fixed income now, and I have to make sure I do not spend money I do not need to if I want to build projects. Besides, at the rate I change which amp is my current main squeese I would go broken using the high priced spread considering I give some of them away.
Edits: 09/29/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: other posters said it was no good, so it was in question. - vinnie2 04:42:56 09/29/17 (2)
- RE: other posters said it was no good, so it was in question. - Tre' 13:35:04 09/29/17 (1)
- RE: other posters said it was no good, so it was in question. - vinnie2 14:33:12 09/29/17 (0)