Re: Wrong. And advice for gusser

Posted by fatbottle on September 14, 2006 at 06:49:56

In Reply to: Wrong. And advice for gusser posted by Jacques on September 14, 2006 at 01:51:12:

Hi ,
I am aware the poster mentioned local decoupling caps . The supply will have a higher impedence with the diodes , peaks drawn by the amps WILL be compressed . The correct way is to implement separate supplies for each amp or pair of amps . You forgot to mention that schottkeys should also be fitted for rectification

cheers

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - LM3875 Power Supply Decoupling? - gusser 09:51:18 09/06/06 (18)

Let me explain deeper: - gusser 10:43:28 09/14/06 (0)

Re: LM3875 Power Supply Decoupling? - fatbottle 08:17:14 09/13/06 (11)

Wrong. And advice for gusser - Jacques 01:51:12 09/14/06 (2)

Re: Wrong. And advice for gusser - fatbottle 06:49:56 09/14/06 (1)

No: no compression with given values. Analysis below - Jacques 08:21:55 10/02/06 (0)

Really ? How.. - cheap-Jack 09:07:01 09/13/06 (7)

Re: Really ? How.. - Ugly 10:15:35 11/30/06 (0)

Re: Really ? How.. - fatbottle 09:31:59 09/13/06 (5)

It's your call, pal. - cheap-Jack 11:50:14 09/13/06 (4)

We are discussing chip amps not tubes - fatbottle 13:00:11 09/13/06 (3)

What's the function of the "local bypass cap"? - cheap-Jack 14:03:34 09/13/06 (2)

Save your moot argument, please. - cheap-Jack 07:46:06 09/14/06 (0)

Re: What's the function of the "local bypass cap"? - fatbottle 14:17:52 09/13/06 (0)

Go for it. - cheap-Jack 11:34:34 09/12/06 (4)

Re: Go for it. - chi7 19:15:12 10/10/06 (0)

Re: Go for it. - fatbottle 09:34:02 09/13/06 (2)

I know. - cheap-Jack 11:55:18 09/13/06 (1)

Re: I know. - fatbottle 12:47:05 09/13/06 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Wrong. And advice for gusser - fatbottle 06:49:56 09/14/06 (1)

No: no compression with given values. Analysis below - Jacques 08:21:55 10/02/06 (0)

Re: Wrong. And advice for gusser

Post a Message!