In Reply to: RE: Ultralinear patent posted by Tre' on September 14, 2023 at 14:32:20:
To my understanding, yes, a number of manufacturers used slightly different taps with as little as only 2% difference in order to get around the patent. This results in a bowed curve.
Of course the tap values must be different depending on the tube; tubes being different from one another and all.
Your Tung Sol reference does not specify what UL was used, only that it was UL. The curves I've seen when the taps are set up properly look very much like a triode. Apparently though the family of curves you get varies quite a lot depending on the tube.
Since Arco controlled the patent and Hafler later went to Dynaco, I find it amusing that he knew how to get around his own patent and proceeded to do so.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Ultralinear patent - Ralph 08:00:47 09/15/23 (2)
- RE: Ultralinear patent - Tre' 14:39:39 09/15/23 (0)
- 40% Just what Acro claims is optimum - Tre' 13:32:19 09/15/23 (0)