In Reply to: Re: I agree... posted by Ted Smith on January 9, 2007 at 18:36:29:
Well I guess the way I see it is that once beyond the question of "can I recognize a difference?", ... and sometimes let's say when comparing two interconnects a certain tune may not lend itself to noticing much, if any, differences ... but once past that point everything for me centers around the *next* question... "which do I prefer?"I'm not saying I never get lead astray, that I don't sometimes think "Yeah, I like that better" only to find that the particular *that* upon examination with more material proves to be an overbearing quality that is ultimately determined to be not a plus but rather a negative. Beyond that there have been cases where longer term listening (i.e. not A-Bing but living with an item) has revealed things that have caused re-evaluation.
But that's not what I was getting at. What I meant was merely the process of A-Bing with fast switching, the process of attempting to detect a sonic difference *at the very instant of the switch*. This type of comparing, and I suspect that most *do* concentrate hard on the *instant of switch* is a generally useless activity in that it seems to almost always yield a *no diffeence* event. I would maintain that differences have to be grotesquely obvious to be detected with the fast switching technique. That's what I have found, it simply does not seem to lend itself to the concentrated listening that I find much more effective for detecting and analysing differences.
Again I believe a lot of befuddled thought related to ideas, even *facts*, about short term aural memory are responsible for the emphasis that has been given to fast switching, ABX boxes, etc. However I suspect that any testing, DBT, SBT, whatever... is basically doomed if it relies on fast switching. It's just my opinion mind you.
No Guru, No Method, No Teacher
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I agree... - bjh 19:48:19 01/09/07 (0)