In Reply to: Woohoo...lookee how much I know, everyone...(nt) posted by mkuller on June 17, 2006 at 11:35:53:
The root of this whole problem is I've posted scientific explantions that clash with his dogma, so he's made it an objective to somehow foster the impression that I'm not worthy of posting technical discussion. (You may notice he's **never** stated anything I've posted as being "correct.")Meanwhile, I say nobody is unworthy of posting technical discussion. If Bozo the Clown thinks he has something constructive to say scientifically, I'd say "welcome!"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I Really Don't See a Point In the Quiz..... - Todd Krieger 12:23:44 06/17/06 (15)
- You've claimed the expertise, now prove it. - real_jj 13:09:39 06/17/06 (0)
- I'm not trying to be an apologist for JJ, but - Ted Smith 12:52:40 06/17/06 (13)
- Hey Ted.... - Todd Krieger 13:21:54 06/17/06 (12)
- Re: Hey Ted.... - Ted Smith 13:33:44 06/17/06 (11)
- You Should Observe.... - Todd Krieger 13:43:41 06/17/06 (10)
- When you say: - real_jj 19:27:29 06/17/06 (0)
- I was trying to discus this with you in a reasonable manner. - Ted Smith 15:00:04 06/17/06 (8)
- Re: I was trying to discus this with you in a reasonable manner. - Todd Krieger 15:26:47 06/17/06 (7)
- I didn't say that you were trying to mislead people - Ted Smith 15:34:00 06/17/06 (6)
- Appreciate the Clarification..... - Todd Krieger 15:40:24 06/17/06 (5)
- Thanks - Ted Smith 16:02:50 06/17/06 (0)
- Dither and reconstruction are two things. - real_jj 15:47:46 06/17/06 (3)
- I Think I Get Your Gist.... - Todd Krieger 15:52:20 06/17/06 (2)
- Oh and there is no debate... - real_jj 19:29:00 06/17/06 (0)
- Not at all. - real_jj 16:03:32 06/17/06 (0)