In Reply to: Re: Question for phony "physicist" Clark Johnsen posted by andy19191 on February 5, 2006 at 11:19:54:
...that the eye is more-or-less the final arbiter. Just as the ear must be, in audio.The "scientific method" as generally practiced in audio by wanna-be PhDs is junk.
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I can assure you that Clark was deeply involved in remote-sensing optics, where he learned... - clarkjohnsen 12:05:52 02/05/06 (7)
- Re: The "scientific method" as generally practiced in audio by wanna-be PhDs is junk - Silver Eared John 23:49:07 02/13/06 (0)
- Re: I can assure you that Clark was deeply involved in remote-sensing optics, where he learned... - andy19191 12:30:52 02/05/06 (5)
- The phrase "wanna-be PhDs" refers to all those who high-handedly preach a received wisdom... - clarkjohnsen 09:56:51 02/06/06 (4)
- No PhD in audio? - Silver Eared John 23:51:26 02/13/06 (0)
- Re: The phrase "wanna-be PhDs" refers to all those who high-handedly preach a received wisdom... - andy19191 11:31:56 02/06/06 (2)
- Yes. And, a "wanna-be PhD." is not a degree candidate. Geez Luiz. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:44:52 02/07/06 (1)
- Re: Yes. And, a "wanna-be PhD." is not a degree candidate. Geez Luiz. nt - andy19191 13:43:19 02/07/06 (0)