Re: "How is the distribution of polarity determined?" Thanks for the easy lob!

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - The relative polarity of CDs to their vinyl record counterparts - georgelouis 22:47:12 05/18/06 (49)

You have to remember the phase (in)coherence of vinyl - real_jj 16:03:05 05/24/06 (12)

Re: You have to remember the phase (in)coherence of vinyl - Todd Krieger 18:24:55 05/27/06 (3)

Re: Nice try... - $orabji! 15:49:35 05/31/06 (0)

Um, have you ever measured it, Todd? - real_jj 14:24:51 05/31/06 (1)

I've SEEN Measurements Substantiating It.... - Todd Krieger 16:20:19 06/06/06 (0)

"It's hard to say what "phase" vinyl is in." Hard for you, perhaps... - clarkjohnsen 08:06:52 05/25/06 (7)

No, Clark, you're off the wall again... - real_jj 08:46:50 05/25/06 (6)

"It is easier to keep CD's in...absolute... phase." Then why don't they? - clarkjohnsen 08:55:49 05/25/06 (5)

Why don't they? - real_jj 12:04:49 05/25/06 (0)

Re: "It is easier to keep CD's in...absolute... phase." Then why don't they? - Bob Lee (QSC) 09:10:50 05/25/06 (3)

"How is the distribution of polarity determined?" Thanks for the easy lob! - clarkjohnsen 10:29:44 05/25/06 (2)

Re: "How is the distribution of polarity determined?" Thanks for the easy lob! - Bob Lee (QSC) 11:12:14 05/25/06 (1)

"The audibility of that difference is equally distributed." ?????? nt - clarkjohnsen 09:37:56 05/26/06 (0)

Re: The relative polarity of CDs to their vinyl record counterparts - STUART 06:29:54 05/23/06 (0)

Re: The relative polarity of CDs to their vinyl record counterparts - Bob Lee (QSC) 09:39:28 05/19/06 (33)

Polarity explained correctly, hope it helps - clarkjohnsen 10:23:04 05/19/06 (32)

Re: Polarity explained correctly, hope it helps - Bill Fitzmaurice 10:08:01 05/23/06 (31)

"Tests show that reversed polarity is more audible than 11.5% intermodulation distortion." - clarkjohnsen 10:28:20 05/23/06 (30)

Re: "Tests show that reversed polarity is more audible than 11.5% intermodulation distortion." - Bill Fitzmaurice 12:59:18 05/23/06 (29)

Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - clarkjohnsen 08:16:48 05/24/06 (28)

Re: Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - Bob Lee (QSC) 09:08:31 05/25/06 (13)

Re: Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - unclestu52 10:33:09 05/25/06 (6)

Are the horn players...sucking, or blowing :) - STUART 07:55:59 06/02/06 (0)

"But one has to train their ears." Although not for long! - clarkjohnsen 09:49:22 05/26/06 (0)

Re: Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - Bill Fitzmaurice 05:51:04 05/26/06 (2)

Sometimes the practice is worth it.... - unclestu52 11:17:31 05/26/06 (0)

"Any sensory pleasure that you have to learn how to enjoy is too much trouble." Huh! - clarkjohnsen 09:47:30 05/26/06 (0)

Re: Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - Bob Lee (QSC) 11:08:17 05/25/06 (0)

You ask, I tell! - clarkjohnsen 10:22:20 05/25/06 (5)

Re: You ask, I tell! - Bob Lee (QSC) 15:36:18 05/25/06 (3)

The overall contexts are presented in The Wood Effect, and they all have to do with music. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:39:45 05/26/06 (2)

The reason I ask - Bob Lee (QSC) 09:17:52 05/30/06 (0)

Re: The overall contexts are presented in The Wood Effect, and they all have to do with music. nt - Bob Lee (QSC) 11:47:13 05/26/06 (0)

Re: You ask, I tell! - Bob Lee (QSC) 11:10:16 05/25/06 (0)

Re: Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - Bill Fitzmaurice 09:10:58 05/24/06 (13)

And here all the time I take crap for recommending stuff that *doesn't* appear in such a journal... - clarkjohnsen 09:46:41 05/24/06 (12)

Re: And here all the time I take crap for recommending stuff that *doesn't* appear in such a journal... - Bob Lee (QSC) 08:55:34 05/25/06 (1)

Question already answered, I believe... nt - clarkjohnsen 09:41:09 05/26/06 (0)

Re: And here all the time I take crap for recommending stuff that *doesn't* appear in such a journal... - Bill Fitzmaurice 12:07:33 05/24/06 (9)

"Cue: This is where you tell me that I don't know how to hear." No. - clarkjohnsen 12:24:51 05/24/06 (8)

Re: "Cue: This is where you tell me that I don't know how to hear." No. - Bill Fitzmaurice 14:25:06 05/24/06 (7)

Haven't a clue what you're trying to say. And if that phrase gives you trouble, try "crossover catastrophe". - clarkjohnsen 08:04:13 05/25/06 (6)

Re: Haven't a clue what you're trying to say. And if that phrase gives you trouble, try "crossover catastrophe". - Bill Fitzmaurice 09:55:54 05/25/06 (5)

Your rudeness betrays you as a man very unsure of himself - clarkjohnsen 10:25:25 05/25/06 (4)

Re: Your rudeness betrays you as a man very unsure of himself - Bill Fitzmaurice 06:02:41 05/26/06 (3)

It was so obviously a frikkin' typo, that your rude defensiveness and your weaseliness become even more manifest. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:36:38 05/26/06 (2)

Thith is geeiten nathsty man.... - STUART 08:23:38 06/02/06 (1)

The arrogant 'hole was criticising a *typo* fer g-dssake! - clarkjohnsen 08:32:16 06/02/06 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: "How is the distribution of polarity determined?" Thanks for the easy lob! - Bob Lee (QSC) 11:12:14 05/25/06 (1)

"The audibility of that difference is equally distributed." ?????? nt - clarkjohnsen 09:37:56 05/26/06 (0)

207.168.191.2