In Reply to: "Tests show that reversed polarity is more audible than 11.5% intermodulation distortion." posted by clarkjohnsen on May 23, 2006 at 10:28:20:
Many things appear in print that are patently silly. This is but one of them.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "Tests show that reversed polarity is more audible than 11.5% intermodulation distortion." - Bill Fitzmaurice 12:59:18 05/23/06 (29)
- Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - clarkjohnsen 08:16:48 05/24/06 (28)
- Re: Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - Bob Lee (QSC) 09:08:31 05/25/06 (13)
- Re: Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - unclestu52 10:33:09 05/25/06 (6)
- Are the horn players...sucking, or blowing :) - STUART 07:55:59 06/02/06 (0)
- "But one has to train their ears." Although not for long! - clarkjohnsen 09:49:22 05/26/06 (0)
- Re: Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - Bill Fitzmaurice 05:51:04 05/26/06 (2)
- Sometimes the practice is worth it.... - unclestu52 11:17:31 05/26/06 (0)
- "Any sensory pleasure that you have to learn how to enjoy is too much trouble." Huh! - clarkjohnsen 09:47:30 05/26/06 (0)
- Re: Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - Bob Lee (QSC) 11:08:17 05/25/06 (0)
- You ask, I tell! - clarkjohnsen 10:22:20 05/25/06 (5)
- Re: You ask, I tell! - Bob Lee (QSC) 15:36:18 05/25/06 (3)
- The overall contexts are presented in The Wood Effect, and they all have to do with music. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:39:45 05/26/06 (2)
- The reason I ask - Bob Lee (QSC) 09:17:52 05/30/06 (0)
- Re: The overall contexts are presented in The Wood Effect, and they all have to do with music. nt - Bob Lee (QSC) 11:47:13 05/26/06 (0)
- Re: You ask, I tell! - Bob Lee (QSC) 11:10:16 05/25/06 (0)
- Re: Huh! And that, in a moderated, peer-reviewed journal of (otherwise?) high integrity. But you must be right... nt - Bill Fitzmaurice 09:10:58 05/24/06 (13)
- And here all the time I take crap for recommending stuff that *doesn't* appear in such a journal... - clarkjohnsen 09:46:41 05/24/06 (12)
- Re: And here all the time I take crap for recommending stuff that *doesn't* appear in such a journal... - Bob Lee (QSC) 08:55:34 05/25/06 (1)
- Question already answered, I believe... nt - clarkjohnsen 09:41:09 05/26/06 (0)
- Re: And here all the time I take crap for recommending stuff that *doesn't* appear in such a journal... - Bill Fitzmaurice 12:07:33 05/24/06 (9)
- "Cue: This is where you tell me that I don't know how to hear." No. - clarkjohnsen 12:24:51 05/24/06 (8)
- Re: "Cue: This is where you tell me that I don't know how to hear." No. - Bill Fitzmaurice 14:25:06 05/24/06 (7)
- Haven't a clue what you're trying to say. And if that phrase gives you trouble, try "crossover catastrophe". - clarkjohnsen 08:04:13 05/25/06 (6)
- Re: Haven't a clue what you're trying to say. And if that phrase gives you trouble, try "crossover catastrophe". - Bill Fitzmaurice 09:55:54 05/25/06 (5)
- Your rudeness betrays you as a man very unsure of himself - clarkjohnsen 10:25:25 05/25/06 (4)
- Re: Your rudeness betrays you as a man very unsure of himself - Bill Fitzmaurice 06:02:41 05/26/06 (3)
- It was so obviously a frikkin' typo, that your rude defensiveness and your weaseliness become even more manifest. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:36:38 05/26/06 (2)
- Thith is geeiten nathsty man.... - STUART 08:23:38 06/02/06 (1)
- The arrogant 'hole was criticising a *typo* fer g-dssake! - clarkjohnsen 08:32:16 06/02/06 (0)