In Reply to: RE: Still no SSE4 support - unlike new VIA Nano, announced for 1st quarter of 2010. posted by fmak on December 22, 2009 at 09:22:26:
How does ssse4 or whatever help audio performance?
Music-playing software that makes proper use of the various SSE instruction sets (the first was developed in 1999 for the PIII), loads the CPU less (is more efficient) than software that doesn't.
The argument is that this improves sound quality. Obviously, the increased efficiency imposes a maintenance overhead that may explain why the relevant instructions do not seem to be used by "mass market" players.
How is the comparison made?
A processor that supports (say) the SSE4 set also supports earlier ones. Different versions of the software under test (i.e. one employing SSE instructions only or SSSE3 or SSE4, etc) can readily be run sequentially on any computer with a suitable CPU and the sound compared.
(Adherents of the Church of the Double-Blind of course have to make their own arrangements but that's the gist of it for the rest of us.)
Dave
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Still no SSE4 support - unlike new VIA Nano, announced for 1st quarter of 2010. - Ryelands 11:13:31 12/22/09 (0)