In Reply to: clarification posted by Joe Murphy Jr on February 14, 2012 at 08:25:53:
.If you want to get data from wherever it resides (physical disc or hard drive or memory or?) to the DAC then a computer has to handle the data. It might be a simple microprocessor in the transport with some simple dedicated code to handle the task or it could be a personal computer, but there is a computer doing the work.
"The transport feeds the signal to a DAC. "Not really, a computer controls the reading of the data and the computer then feeds the data to the DAC. I understand your desire to be blind to this process, to assume that whoever designed the hardware and wrote the software did it optimally and therefore lead you to be believe it is as good as it can possibly be, but that is a huge assumption. Why do you feel having some influence is a bad thing? I see it as a plus.
BTW your use of series/parallel is rather unconventional :>)
.
Edits: 02/14/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I think your idea that a computer is somehow bad for sound is misguided - bwb 08:49:24 02/14/12 (10)
- progress - Joe Murphy Jr 09:41:52 02/14/12 (9)
- regress actually, I see no way to get away from interaction of the device - bwb 10:40:11 02/14/12 (8)
- on last try - Joe Murphy Jr 15:49:47 02/14/12 (7)
- RE: on last try - John Swenson 17:04:20 02/14/12 (1)
- thank you - Joe Murphy Jr 20:48:49 02/14/12 (0)
- Won't work, you are missing a critical part - bwb 16:38:06 02/14/12 (4)
- well - Joe Murphy Jr 21:11:23 02/14/12 (3)
- funny - bwb 05:58:58 02/15/12 (2)
- not at all - Joe Murphy Jr 19:05:11 02/15/12 (1)
- forgive me, my mistake - bwb 19:23:04 02/15/12 (0)