In Reply to: Re: I suspect we are now talking about subjective perception ... posted by Sordidman on May 10, 2006 at 16:12:42:
I wasn't sure how you were going to react to my post, so thanks for taking it in the spirit that it was intended.I do agree that subjective impressions are the heart of why we enjoy music - at the end of the day we have to enjoy the music, regardless of theoretical objections. However, subjective impressions can also be misleading - as Ted pointed out, some people seem to *like* jitter, and upsampling filters, PCM "ringing" artefacts, etc..
If the majority of APL owners prefer to listen to SA-CDs converted to PCM, then that is a valid mode of listening. However, it may be a result that is very system specific, and can't be generalised into "therefore DSD converted to PCM is a good thing under ALL circumstances"
Since you like stories, I can offer two short ones.
Once I visited the home of a well known SA-CD basher who used to frequent this forum. This person used to say that SA-CD sounded dull and the high frequencies don't have the crispness of PCM. Well, guess what, I listened to his system and he is right! On *his* system, it is clear that SA-CD high frequencies sounded terrible! However, that is *not* the experience I have listening to SA-CDs on Ted's or mikel's or even my system.
Another short story: at one stage CDs actually sounded better than SA-CDs on my (old) system. It surprised even me, but it was unmistakeable. High frequencies sounded dull and smeary, and lack the punchiness and crispness of DVD-Audio or even CD.
After some experimentation, I discovered the reason. My amp did not handle the ultrasonic noise generated by DSD very well - simply applying a low pass filter made it sound much better. On that basis, I upgraded my amps and now SA-CDs sound just fine.
So I'm not surprised that many APL owners may prefer the sound of DSD converted to PCM. But at the same time, I personally would prefer not converting and solving system specific issues with DSD playback directly.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Thanks for your gracious reply - Christine Tham 17:32:11 05/10/06 (3)
- Of course... - Sordidman 20:06:31 05/10/06 (2)
- Re: Of course... - Christine Tham 23:12:04 05/10/06 (1)
- Grail? We've already got one!! - Sordidman 11:15:48 05/11/06 (0)