107.147.215.251
'); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: HiFiman RE400 seem to get well-reviewed posted by jedrider on November 23, 2014 at 21:58:47
He continually compares them to the RE zero, which is the balanced version of the zero. When he does he always makes excuses for them, "Lows: To many out there this is still going to be lacking in the lows. Quantity wise it’s a step up from the RE-ZERO and 0 but a bass monster this is not. That said the quality is just as you expect, outstanding" " The 0 as I’ve said was stunningly good but a bit soulless. The 400 is still a bit dry but no more of that thinne" " It’ll come as no surprise to anyone that the highs here are truly excellent. Hand on heart though I do believe the 0 just beats them but it’s so close who cares, it’s not like anything else for this money can." I have been using the RE-zero for a few years, not much use, actually as they were dry bass light and not particularly engaging. I paid about $100 for them, for iem's I am using a pair of earjax sonics, and at about $60 they were and are much bore engaging. If you would like the re-0 sell it to you cheap!
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: