|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
Register / Login
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: Re: Answers posted by bjh on February 26, 2007 at 08:29:53:
>Personally I would think it would be very useful to have this
>information routinely provided in the "Associated Equipment" section
>of each review.
I have listed my own components in another response. Speaking
personally, why I don't mind providing such information, I believe
other reviewers, particularly for other magazines, will not be as
forthcoming. But to do so in the magazine is cumbersome given the
churn in components used and, I believe, unnecessary. Either you
trust a magazine and read it or you don't trust it and you don't
read it.
I also wonder what your agenda is? Art Dudley and Michael Fremer have
mentioned in the magazine what they own, John Marks and I have done
so in this thread, yet you (and others) don't seem able to leave this
subject alone with respect to Stereophile. Why don't you put the
question to the reviewers and editors of other magzines that frequent
this forum before continuing your inquisition of Stereophile's
writers?
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Answers - John Atkinson 10:57:48 02/26/07 (1)
- My advice to you... - bjh 12:48:26 02/26/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
