![]() |
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: Answers posted by John Atkinson on February 26, 2007 at 06:45:37:
I would appreciate you thoughts some of the other things the poster said, in particular:>I want to see a list of what the reviewer thought enough of to
>spend his/her $$ on and regularly use in their system(s). Want to
>mention more? Fine, then be forthright and list it as a >gift, "manufacturer-abandoned" leftover, "bought-but-no-longer-
>used" etc.Personally I would think it would be very useful to have this information routinely provided in the "Associated Equipment" section of each review.
Perhaps to avoid making this a life's work something as simple as subsections for Owned and Loaned in each category of the "Associated Equipment" list; gifts could go with Owned, such an item prefixed with "(gift)" for example.
True there would be some work gathering the revisions from each reviewer but after that I imagine ongoing changes would be no more onerous that what is required today for the current format.
What do you think?
No Guru, No Method, No Teacher
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Answers - bjh 08:29:53 02/26/07 (4)
- Equipment to Diet For - Jim Austin 11:04:22 02/26/07 (1)
- Cute. :) nt - bjh 11:15:18 02/26/07 (0)
- Re: Answers - John Atkinson 10:57:48 02/26/07 (1)
- My advice to you... - bjh 12:48:26 02/26/07 (0)