RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material"

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Buckeye Purifi Eigentakt 1ET9040BA monoblock power amplifier - emailtim 17:16:07 12/19/24 (37)

RE: Buckeye Purifi Eigentakt 1ET9040BA monoblock power amplifier - Alex M 01:38:58 12/24/24 (4)

RE: Buckeye Purifi Eigentakt 1ET9040BA monoblock power amplifier - emailtim 20:59:35 12/27/24 (3)

RE: Buckeye Purifi Eigentakt 1ET9040BA monoblock power amplifier - Alex M 13:16:57 12/28/24 (2)

That Preamp should sound.... - Cougar 15:28:23 12/28/24 (1)

RE: That Preamp should sound.... - Alex M 10:38:02 12/30/24 (0)

Updated review scheduled for April 2025 - emailtim 20:24:42 12/22/24 (13)

RE: Updated review scheduled for April 2025 - John Atkinson 12:49:54 05/14/25 (0)

Or, perhaps, it is the Buckeye input amplifier to blame? - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 15:02:30 12/23/24 (7)

RE: Or, perhaps, it is the Buckeye input amplifier to blame? - emailtim 15:13:04 12/23/24 (6)

RE: Or, perhaps, it is the Buckeye input amplifier to blame? - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 14:22:02 12/24/24 (5)

RE: Or, perhaps, it is the Buckeye input amplifier to blame? - emailtim 14:41:44 12/24/24 (4)

RE: Or, perhaps, it is the Buckeye input amplifier to blame? - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 16:32:11 12/24/24 (3)

RE: Or, perhaps, it is the Buckeye input amplifier to blame? - George6 20:23:13 12/25/24 (1)

RE: Or, perhaps, it is the Buckeye input amplifier to blame? - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 17:14:04 12/26/24 (0)

RE: Or, perhaps, it is the Buckeye input amplifier to blame? - emailtim 16:45:26 12/24/24 (0)

Thanks. I just saw that in the review Comments section - AbeCollins 21:12:45 12/22/24 (3)

The INT-60 Is not an overly "neutral" amp - Jack G 06:14:45 12/23/24 (2)

RE: The INT-60 Is not an overly "neutral" amp - AbeCollins 08:42:30 12/23/24 (1)

RE: The INT-60 Is not an overly "neutral" amp - Jack G 12:27:27 12/23/24 (0)

"On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - Feanor 09:14:50 12/22/24 (9)

RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - Kal Rubinson 10:15:19 12/22/24 (8)

RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - ejman 10:41:40 12/22/24 (7)

RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - Kal Rubinson 12:07:08 12/22/24 (6)

RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - ejman 12:27:12 12/22/24 (5)

RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - hahax@verizon.net 19:34:22 12/22/24 (0)

Yup. - Kal Rubinson 14:35:46 12/22/24 (3)

RE: Yup. - George6 18:42:31 12/22/24 (2)

RE: Yup. - Kal Rubinson 12:02:52 12/23/24 (0)

On a related note, awaiting Kal - AbeCollins 20:51:08 12/22/24 (0)

Requires only - E-Stat 09:19:12 12/20/24 (7)

probably still less finicky than a Boeing 737 MAX, though - mhardy6647 12:08:48 12/20/24 (6)

PS -- oh, in all seriousness, thanks for sharing the info & link, emailtim - mhardy6647 12:21:40 12/20/24 (5)

You can read my thoughts!?!? (NT) - Kal Rubinson 11:47:36 12/21/24 (4)

Kal did your online review have more photos ? - AbeCollins 21:59:55 12/21/24 (1)

Yes. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 07:01:53 12/22/24 (0)

ooh, caught using imprecise syntax! - mhardy6647 18:18:49 12/21/24 (1)

You would know. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 19:55:31 12/21/24 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - Kal Rubinson 10:15:19 12/22/24 (8)

RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - ejman 10:41:40 12/22/24 (7)

RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - Kal Rubinson 12:07:08 12/22/24 (6)

RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - ejman 12:27:12 12/22/24 (5)

RE: "On the other hand, they will not "improve" source material" - hahax@verizon.net 19:34:22 12/22/24 (0)

Yup. - Kal Rubinson 14:35:46 12/22/24 (3)

RE: Yup. - George6 18:42:31 12/22/24 (2)

RE: Yup. - Kal Rubinson 12:02:52 12/23/24 (0)

On a related note, awaiting Kal - AbeCollins 20:51:08 12/22/24 (0)

Post a Message!