![]() |
Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: Interesting.... posted by AbeCollins on July 15, 2023 at 18:33:12:
The Panny receiver I mentioned I bought in 2002/3.The concept of bypassing DAC seems appealing especially with the increasing digital dominance due to streaming, etc. But I suppose the power amps would need different "front ends" to what they have typically got.
Unless I'm confused about it, I think NAD had some "direct digital" amps for a while, but I'm not spotting any of these in their current lineup.
NOT the 51st state, eh!?!
Edits: 07/16/23
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Nothing really new ... surprised we don't see it more today - Feanor 04:31:11 07/16/23 (7)
- RE: Nothing really new ... surprised we don't see it more today - cawson@onetel.com 05:55:53 07/16/23 (6)
- I wasn't clear about that - Feanor 07:53:05 07/16/23 (5)
- RE: I wasn't clear about that - cawson@onetel.com 11:47:36 07/16/23 (4)
- It's pretty unique but not sure about that approach - AbeCollins 13:14:07 07/16/23 (3)
- RE: It's pretty unique but not sure about that approach - cawson@onetel.com 03:27:24 07/17/23 (1)
- It's more than the DAC itself: - Freo-1 18:33:44 07/19/23 (0)
- RE: It's pretty unique but not sure about that approach - voolston 17:25:44 07/16/23 (0)