In Reply to: You have summed it up succinctly posted by 13th Duke of Wymbourne on January 8, 2025 at 10:56:49:
Thanks for the link!
But that does not mean the numbers are wrong.
Just most "numbers" lack relevancy to what we hear. Notable exceptions include frequency response and linearity which is clearly audible. Given the complexity of a dynamic musical waveform, accuracy to exactly what? There's a difference between information and knowledge.
Many years ago, there was a similarly surly wannabe speaker designer who liked to call what he didn't understand or perceive "voodoo". He threw down the gauntlet and challenged me to a duel using an online DBT. I recently recounted the experience here. Follow the supplied hyperlinks to the Klippel site and see what you think! I'm not a Tracy Chapman fan, but serves as a point of reference after some familiarity with the content.
Everyone is entitled to their perception. Those who claim *superiority*, however, are merely deluding themselves in a specious cloak of unvalidated controls. Mr. Gory has demonstrated that he no idea why he believes what he does. Merely regurgitates what he's read. And goes all over the place completely missing the core question.
I find your posts a delight to read. :)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: You have summed it up succinctly - E-Stat 11:35:02 01/08/25 (8)
- A disclaimer - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 13:36:33 01/10/25 (7)
- RE: A disclaimer - E-Stat 13:41:24 01/10/25 (6)
- RE: A disclaimer - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 14:53:50 01/10/25 (5)
- Choose as you will - E-Stat 15:14:15 01/10/25 (4)
- You shall not Pass - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 16:19:14 01/10/25 (3)
- Merely one of many - E-Stat 17:15:33 01/10/25 (2)
- One of the most ignorant posts you've made here. - goryu 05:37:21 03/08/25 (0)
- Just as you feel about correction, I feel we'be beaten this topic into submission (nt) - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 17:36:49 01/10/25 (0)