RE: Again, not with today's technology

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - If you can hear it, can you measure it? - magiccarpetride 13:51:44 02/14/11 (62)

RE: Measurement equipment can - BigguyinATL 05:17:49 02/16/11 (0)

If you hear it, is it real? - slapshot 09:38:33 02/15/11 (6)

RE: If you hear it, is it real? - magiccarpetride 10:08:40 02/15/11 (5)

If you have concensus... - slapshot 12:47:33 02/15/11 (3)

more of a chance, but no guarantee - wazoo 14:18:49 02/15/11 (2)

RE: more of a chance, but no guarantee - josh358 17:57:20 02/16/11 (0)

agreed (nt) - slapshot 15:17:18 02/15/11 (0)

RE: If you hear it, is it real? - ahendler 11:22:54 02/15/11 (0)

Not with today's technology, we don't know what to measure - kff 09:02:06 02/15/11 (6)

RE: Not with today's technology, we don't know what to measure - DavidJames 09:17:17 02/15/11 (5)

Again, not with today's technology - kff 20:47:12 02/15/11 (4)

RE: Again, not with today's technology - josh358 18:00:50 02/16/11 (2)

RE: Again, not with today's technology - magiccarpetride 10:20:30 02/17/11 (1)

RE: Again, not with today's technology - josh358 11:08:44 02/17/11 (0)

RE: Again, not with today's technology - ahendler 21:08:14 02/15/11 (0)

News Flash - The age of dicovery is over - rrob 03:13:33 02/15/11 (0)

Probably, but it might take a lot of digging... - morricab 02:24:16 02/15/11 (0)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - hahax@verizon.net 20:48:02 02/14/11 (2)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - josh358 18:10:57 02/16/11 (0)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - magiccarpetride 09:37:49 02/16/11 (0)

If you can hear it but not measure it, then you're measuring the wrong thing. - Duke 19:25:20 02/14/11 (1)

RE: If you can hear it but not measure it, then you're measuring the wrong thing. - Rod H. 16:27:49 02/15/11 (0)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - josh358 16:16:46 02/14/11 (11)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - magiccarpetride 10:36:10 02/15/11 (8)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - josh358 08:09:25 02/16/11 (7)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - dromney 15:13:48 02/17/11 (1)

Man, I'd have to sell my yacht! (NT) - josh358 09:24:43 02/18/11 (0)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - magiccarpetride 10:32:42 02/17/11 (4)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - josh358 11:23:46 02/17/11 (3)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - dromney 15:23:18 02/17/11 (2)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - josh358 09:23:37 02/18/11 (1)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - dromney 15:21:58 02/20/11 (0)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - ahendler 17:59:44 02/14/11 (1)

Agree completely - josh358 18:10:17 02/14/11 (0)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - DrChaos 16:10:15 02/14/11 (0)

RE: If you can hear it, can you measure it? - DavidJames 15:47:14 02/14/11 (0)

Not necessarily, IMO - we may (currently) have no idea what it is we need to measure! :-)) ... - andyr 15:20:54 02/14/11 (14)

RE: Not necessarily, IMO - we may (currently) have no idea what it is we need to measure! :-)) ... - pictureguy 16:46:40 02/14/11 (0)

RE: Not necessarily, IMO - we may (currently) have no idea what it is we need to measure! :-)) ... - DrChaos 16:13:01 02/14/11 (2)

That could indeed be the case, Dr. But ... - andyr 16:21:01 02/14/11 (1)

Some of this is known - josh358 18:14:26 02/14/11 (0)

RE: Not necessarily, IMO - we may (currently) have no idea what it is we need to measure! :-)) ... - dromney 16:01:36 02/14/11 (7)

You seem to be recommending random measurement of "things" ... - andyr 16:17:33 02/14/11 (6)

RE: You seem to be recommending random measurement of "things" ... - dromney 12:40:07 02/15/11 (2)

RE: You seem to be recommending random measurement of "things" ... - josh358 18:13:55 02/16/11 (0)

RE: You seem to be recommending random measurement of "things" ... - ahendler 13:18:27 02/15/11 (0)

RE: You seem to be recommending random measurement of "things" ... - josh358 16:28:12 02/14/11 (2)

Sure, Josh, understood ... - andyr 16:35:56 02/14/11 (1)

RE: Sure, Josh, understood ... - josh358 16:46:01 02/14/11 (0)

RE: Not necessarily, IMO - we may (currently) have no idea what it is we need to measure! :-)) ... - magiccarpetride 15:31:04 02/14/11 (1)

:-)) nt - andyr 15:32:09 02/14/11 (0)

of course - farfetched 15:09:50 02/14/11 (9)

RE: of course - lmckines2@paxio.net 23:31:37 02/14/11 (0)

RE: of course - ahendler 18:03:48 02/14/11 (0)

RE: of course - magiccarpetride 15:13:51 02/14/11 (6)

RE: of course - josh358 16:34:42 02/14/11 (2)

RE: of course - ahendler 18:05:27 02/14/11 (1)

RE: of course - josh358 18:18:13 02/14/11 (0)

How does one measure the intensity of love aroused through one's senses? - wazoo 16:25:17 02/14/11 (2)

addendum on the efficiency of the human brain - wazoo 17:06:53 02/14/11 (1)

Yes, I saw it. - esande 18:06:18 02/14/11 (0)

NO! nt - ahendler 14:13:56 02/14/11 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Again, not with today's technology - ahendler 21:08:14 02/15/11 (0)

Post a Message!