![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Re: active vs passive crossovers; long job! posted by Franco on June 21, 2001 at 18:35:02:
Whew/Wow/ Boy seems like a BIG job just to bi-amp correctly.I just dont think i could do all that changing things by myself. I"m not that good at electronics and such.Q. i am now bi-amping this system without a crossover. it sounds good.THe gain on the McCormack is 31db. and the VAC gain is 32-35 varible with a switch on the front of the amp..Now it being only 1db off do you think the sound will be that off? What if i put the MAC on the top (tweeter) and the VAC on the bottom? Better or worse..I know these Qs are hard to figure since you can not hear them but what do yoy think,Should i just get mono-blocks and forget about bi-amping..The way the system sounds now is better tighter bass big soundstage..more clear sound...Any thoughs.. Thanks for your time..By the way my system is listed on AA....
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: active vs passive crossovers; long job! - kkak66@aol.com 19:07:30 06/21/01 (1)
- Re: active vs passive crossovers; long job! short job! - Franco 13:35:52 06/22/01 (0)
- Re: active vs passive crossovers; long job! short job! - Franco 13:35:53 06/22/01 (0)
- Re: active vs passive crossovers; long job! short job! - Franco 13:35:54 06/22/01 (0)
- Re: active vs passive crossovers; long job! short job! - Franco 13:35:53 06/22/01 (0)