![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: upgrade op-amps for the Adcom GFP 565 Preamp posted by bobwire on March 17, 2015 at 18:31:54:
Hi and i think you are very right indeed
This is a point very overlooked. The op-amps to sound clean and powerful need many and fast uF very close to them.
I have a Hegel preamp ... a P20. I see many OPA604 inside with quite big caps (i see 1000uF/63V) very close to the OPA. The sound is very clean and powerful. Not the typical hardness associated with op-amp.
For me the caps are like dampers and music like a rough path with ditches and hills.
The smaller the caps the less energy is stored and then available during music peaks.
I think that a good starting value could be 470 uF of very good quality.
But i could even use up to 2200uF ... the working voltage is usually low and so also prices for these caps.
I have here a nice heaphone amp with powerful op-amp buffers (250 mA or current available) but almost no caps close to the buffers.
I find the sound clean but hard. I am completely sure two big caps would have changed the sound for the better. I am sure of that.
A little sharpness in the details, instead, can be effectively tamed with break-in and the right cable selection (i.e. copper solid core o litz wires).
I am keeping this preamp. Even if it is op-amp based (scandal !).
I have also an old Electrocompaniet 4.5 fully discrete and more rounded and soft.
I like the transparency of the Hegel better.
Very clean line stage indeed.
So op-amps can be extremely good when rightly used.
Thanks again for confirming a sensation.
Kind regards,
bg
Edits: 05/17/15 05/17/15 05/17/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: upgrade op-amps for the Adcom GFP 565 Preamp - beppe61 03:04:15 05/17/15 (0)