|
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
|
|
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: If I read you correctly (mine eyes glazed over before halfway down)... posted by clarkjohnsen on October 25, 2006 at 10:29:50:
You're obviously not reading at all, Clark.
...you still agree with George Louis that 1's and 0's equate reliably to acoustic polarity.Still agree? What's this still agree shit? When did I EVER agree with it?
Again, go back to my first reply to your first question. You asked:
"Its output is inverted." From what? one must ask
I answered, "From the data encoded on the CD. Which of course itself may or may not have preserved absolute polarity of what was actually recorded."
Did you get it that time Clark? You didn't get it the first time I said it. You didn't get it the second time I said it. Maybe the third time will be the charm.
You brought that up, and you let that statement stand; and it is wrong.I brought what up exactly? I didn't bring anything up with regard to polarity. Geoff's the one who brought up polarity. Talk to him about it.
se
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- If you read me correctly? - Steve Eddy 12:20:56 10/25/06 (3)
- "I brought what up exactly?" The bit about "1's and 0's"... - clarkjohnsen 12:29:09 10/25/06 (2)
- You mean the two's compliment that flew over your head? - Steve Eddy 13:39:49 10/25/06 (1)
- *chirp* *chirp* *chirp* *chirp* *chirp* - Steve Eddy 09:33:56 10/26/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
