![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Amen posted by CD on October 21, 2006 at 10:35:43:
Anyone who rejects a reported repeatable phenomenon out of hand is NOT a scientist. If that were taken accross the board there would be no advances in either knowledge or technology, etc. Remember when there were 96 elements, PERIOD; an element cannot be changed into another element; an element cannot be created/manufactured ? That was "Scirntific Truth" not that long ago but we now know that all of the above were not true then and are not true now. True scientists have open minds and when they see a repeatable phenomenon they are driven to find out, if possible, how and why it happens. What "scientist" would have believed some 65 years ago that a petri dish containing the moldy residue of a failed experiment would turn out to be the greatest boon of the century ? Before the discovery of penicillin if you had an infection that could not be cured by amputation "Doctor say you goan die", and you DID.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Amen - pkell44 16:46:01 10/21/06 (5)
- Re: Amen - CD 02:05:48 10/22/06 (0)
- Re: Amen - Steve Eddy 18:50:34 10/21/06 (3)
- Re: Amen - catman78 19:43:21 10/21/06 (2)
- Re: Amen - Steve Eddy 10:59:42 10/22/06 (1)
- Isn't that pretty much the same thing I do?... - Wellfed 21:54:51 10/26/06 (0)