|
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
|
|
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Silicon carbide versus silicon Schottky posted by Al Sekela on October 17, 2006 at 21:29:03:
Hi Al Sekela,
thank you so much for the explanation.
I'm sure that I will never surpase or overload the device since this will be for replace a Bridge rectifier on the filament supply for a 300B tube. It's consumition is about 5v and 2 or 3 amperes.
There is many folks that do this upgrade improving the sound.
So, now I must take a choice on CREE 600 v 4a or IR 100 or 150 v, 8 or 10 a. All can cover largerly the demands of a 300B.
Regards,
Beto
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Silicon carbide versus silicon Schottky - beto1 04:34:00 10/18/06 (10)
- Then I would go with the silicon device. - Al Sekela 08:31:03 10/18/06 (9)
- Re: if Sic Scottky are not in the limit - beto1 19:28:55 10/18/06 (7)
- No obvious physical reason for a sonic difference, - Al Sekela 10:04:32 10/19/06 (6)
- higher forward voltage...... - beto1 18:21:22 10/19/06 (3)
- Higher diode forward voltage may be a problem. - Al Sekela 22:09:13 10/20/06 (2)
- Re: Higher diode forward voltage may be a problem. - beto1 08:46:51 10/21/06 (1)
- Here is where I run out of ideas to help you... - Al Sekela 12:10:51 10/21/06 (0)
- Re: No obvious physical reason for a sonic difference, - pkell44 13:17:59 10/19/06 (1)
- Re: No obvious physical reason for a sonic difference, - beto1 18:17:42 10/19/06 (0)
- Re: Then I would go with the silicon device. - beto1 18:27:10 10/18/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
