In Reply to: True, but only Farner can play it like that Messenger guitar distortion-bathed solos... posted by Audiophilander on January 24, 2007 at 16:49:10:
I don't get the Messenger reference, you mean like Jesus? I liked Grand Funk BTW, and used to take constant bashing from people because I said they were better than the Cream. They were not better musicians, I was wrong. But I would rather hear GFR than Cream any day. Possibly Farners voice, which IS WAY easier on the ears than Bruce's.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Howe, yes, yes, yes (boy did he look sickly last year!) - Duilawyer 21:20:00 01/24/07 (8)
- Re: Grand Funk versus Cream - Roscoe East 13:02:55 01/25/07 (4)
- No contest.............. - danj 00:33:46 01/28/07 (3)
- Further evidence that there is no objective metric for art - Roscoe East 13:17:10 01/29/07 (2)
- Real "art" is subjective. There can be no truly objective metric - danj 23:56:15 01/29/07 (1)
- Re: Real "art" is subjective. There can be no truly objective metric - Roscoe East 14:03:47 01/30/07 (0)
- Ummm, the Messenger is an obscure el-cheapo brand of electric guitar (now rare & pricey) that Mark played... - Audiophilander 22:50:19 01/24/07 (2)
- photo of Mark Farner w/ his Messenger guitar - Roscoe East 13:16:27 01/26/07 (1)
- Thanks! Apparently the photo image I linked disappeared; too bad, because it was a great shot as well. - Audiophilander 00:14:27 01/27/07 (0)