In Reply to: But then there's this from the CBC posted by Chris from Lafayette on April 7, 2015 at 17:20:32:
This just isn't a freedom of speech issue, as I said. People take for granted the great public importance of what a major symphony orchestra does in a case like this or in general, but when it comes to public (i.e., government) funding of such artistic institutions, they are much less enthusiastic.
Well, guess what? That leaves orchestras much more subject to the whims of wealthy patrons, like the one who may have been behind the decision to cancel Ms. Lisitsa's performances, according to her. (Though I think Rick W's explanation is more likely.) That's the free enterprise system at work. And there is nothing illegal about it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- That's faulty analysis. - rbolaw 18:07:19 04/07/15 (6)
- But the Toronto Symphony is at least partially funded by the government, isn't it? - Chris from Lafayette 18:33:50 04/07/15 (5)
- Not enough, I guess - rbolaw 19:11:50 04/07/15 (4)
- "a decision like this can backfire" - Chris from Lafayette 19:30:04 04/07/15 (3)
- That's nothing new - rbolaw 05:56:12 04/08/15 (0)
- RE: Krystian Zimerman - Ivan303 20:24:55 04/07/15 (1)
- RE: Krystian Zimerman - Analog Scott 22:14:13 04/07/15 (0)