In Reply to: RE: In ways that posted by PaulF70 on March 7, 2025 at 17:53:49:
dynamic challenges often posed by passive attenuators.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- And conversely - E-Stat 20:50:29 03/07/25 (18)
- RE: And conversely - PaulF70 17:33:49 03/10/25 (0)
- RE: And conversely - Tre' 06:15:59 03/08/25 (16)
- Impedance marching - E-Stat 07:40:01 03/08/25 (15)
- RE: Impedance marching - Tre' 08:37:22 03/08/25 (14)
- I argued that point with Charles Hanson - E-Stat 08:54:46 03/08/25 (13)
- Right about what? nt - Tre' 09:02:04 03/08/25 (12)
- Passives rob dynamics - E-Stat 09:03:24 03/08/25 (11)
- There is no such thing as a "passive" in an electronic system. - Chip647 13:02:16 03/08/25 (6)
- You have a good point. - Tre' 17:53:26 03/08/25 (0)
- There are no active components - E-Stat 14:34:39 03/08/25 (4)
- Attenuator Box - Inmate51 16:11:55 03/08/25 (3)
- Built one using Radio Shack parts - E-Stat 16:15:18 03/08/25 (2)
- RE: Built one using Radio Shack parts - Inmate51 05:39:09 03/09/25 (1)
- RE: Built one using Radio Shack parts - E-Stat 07:41:06 03/09/25 (0)
- And we have come full circle. - Tre' 09:06:44 03/08/25 (3)
- Absolutely not - E-Stat 09:08:33 03/08/25 (2)
- Do you think it is unknowable? nt - Tre' 09:55:13 03/08/25 (1)
- It is knowable to me - E-Stat 10:19:02 03/08/25 (0)