In Reply to: This explains a lot about Stereophile posted by mbnx01 on December 26, 2010 at 21:35:41:
>The fact that you choose to spend your time getting into a flame-war on
>some bulletin board explains a lot about why your magazine is as sad as it
>is.
To recap, you said you let your Stereophile subscription lapse because we
reviewed "ten thousand dollar DAC's and twenty thousand dollar amplifiers."
I pointed out that you were ignoring "all the affordable products we
cover? In a depth you don't find anywhere else?" And I offered you a link
to a landing page here you can find those reviews. Unless you were saying
that it doesn't matter that we do review affordable products, it is the
presence of reviews of expensive components that bothers you? In which
case, I suggest you have unrealistic expectations - there isn't a
magazine in existence that ignores Ferraris or even Audis in favor of an
exclusive diet of Kias.
Instead of acknowledging that at the very least the subject was not as
black and white as you had made out, you called me "arrogant."
>No vision. Poor judgment. Yup. That's Stereophile.
Sorry to ruffle your feathers. I guess you are continuing the tradition
that on the Internet, an anonymous troll will never ever admit to being
wrong about _anything_ :-)
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: This explains a lot about Stereophile - John Atkinson 05:38:21 12/27/10 (0)