In Reply to: Re: I have to get the last word in of course posted by MarkgM on August 28, 2003 at 11:28:19:
You Wrote:
"As I said, you're bearing has struck me as egotistical My point about you is to describe your behavior as adamant and dictatorial, not allowing other points of view in the face of your own."My reply:
Thank you for the complements. I'll put them on my resume.
I believe I accused you of speculating in one of my posts,
so I guess I deserved this outburst of affection.
.
.
.
You wrote:
"In my experience, a 70 watt amp blew a 300 watt woofer."My reply:
Assuming the amplifier was honestly rated at 70wpc, it should
be able to reach roughly 140wpc at high levels of distortion.
Therefore, the woofer was unable to survive roughly 140wpc
due to overexcursion I assume, and most likely was overrated
at "300 Watts" ... or this rating only referred to the voice coil's ability to dissipate heat, and didn't account for overexcursion damage. Not very useful speaker or drivers power handling specs are common in audio.
JBL Pro drivers, for example, are rated for power handling using pink noise with a 6dB crest factor and the protection of a 40Hz. 12dB/octave high-pass filter. Someone I know damaged his JBL 2235 15" subwoofer driver from overexcusion because he he didn't understand how the JBL power handling number was calculated.
He used a very powerful amplifier and had no high-pass filter to protect his ported driver below the port tuning frequency.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The last ... last word - Richard BassNut Greene 13:41:54 08/28/03 (0)