|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: That JBL Pro article is about 30 years old and misleading posted by Richard BassNut Greene on August 25, 2003 at 17:00:59:
"... not to mention that pro usage is not comparable to home audio"Sorry, I flatly reject that; in fact, besides that all the physics are the same, the longer I am at this the less distinction (and need for distinction) I see.
As for the JBL article, no, I don't believe by any stretch that they wrote it to sell higher power amps; they wrote it to lower warranty costs, as did Klipsch, etc.
"Today, pro sound production companies can monitor speakers and amplifiers real time via computer links to built-in sensors in the equipment, not to mention using limiters that immediately cut power to prevent clipping. They take no chances."Yes, I know that, and I know that that pro sound people still know the value of sufficient power.
Anyway, here is another newer doc that describes recommended power based on speakers input rating. But then again, maybe they are just trying to sell something..........
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: That JBL Pro article is about 30 years old and misleading - mikebake 17:25:23 08/25/03 (3)
- Had read that article years ago too! - Richard BassNut Greene 18:06:47 08/25/03 (2)
- Ha! - mikebake 18:16:05 08/25/03 (1)
- Then you're a smart guy - Richard BassNut Greene 18:42:46 08/25/03 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
