![]() |
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: Sorry folks, I failed to clarify my position in a way you can relate to. posted by George Mann on November 24, 2006 at 02:21:28:
I'm still not with you. As far as I can see you failed to clarify your position to a bunch of experienced EEs.Please explain "point of reference".
Please explain "shifts from one ... reference point to another"
Please explain "clearly skewed representation"
Please explain "the ability to present 2 or more levels of threshold simultaneously"
And please do so in a way that makes it clear that you are not discussing quantisation error and a lack of reconstruction filtering.
Also please define the sort of digital system you are comparing to the sort of analogue system. Is this about the mathematics of sampling and/or quantisation? About ADC/DAC chip limitations? About ADC/DAC systems? Mathematical analogue? Magnetic tape? LP?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Sorry folks, I failed to clarify my position in a way you can relate to. - Werner 02:51:34 11/24/06 (6)
- You people are hopeless, and I never should have expected you to understand! - George Mann 03:01:49 11/24/06 (5)
- Nope, we know that it isn't perfect - Ted Smith 09:22:30 11/24/06 (4)
- And I'm afraid you never will. nt. - George Mann 11:25:09 11/24/06 (3)
- We know the standard technology and terminology, why do you give up so easily? [nt] - Ted Smith 11:31:46 11/24/06 (2)
- It would be best just to drop the subject. Here's why... - George Mann 12:06:49 11/24/06 (1)
- You might get some respect if you showed others some... - Ted Smith 12:47:13 11/24/06 (0)