In Reply to: Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD posted by Todd Krieger on August 16, 2006 at 22:03:34:
I can upsample RB to DSD as well as play SACD. Basically RB upsampled to DSD sounds very similar to native SACD if no direct comparison is made. When a direct comparison is made between the two media then SACD is superior.As far as RBCD compared to RBCD upsampled to DSD is concerned I have sympathy with those who say leave it as 16/44.1. There is a better sense of "thereness" with RB straight. I leave ny system doing straight RB for months at a time. But eventually I always drift back to DSD upsampling. This is with a diet of mainly classical music where the overall smoothness and grain free nature of DSD upsampling has particular merit.
In regard to upsampling RB to other sampling rates e.g. PCM 176.4 or 192 then the issue is not as clear cut and straight RB could be my preference. BTW, as always the digital interconnects have a large effect upon the result.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - PAR 23:55:28 08/16/06 (13)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Pinco Pallino 07:27:58 08/17/06 (12)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Todd Krieger 22:12:24 08/17/06 (0)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - PAR 10:03:25 08/17/06 (10)
- musicians have a right to pick metronomes - that's, my name 10:13:40 08/18/06 (9)
- addendum: disco sucked.. not - that's, my name 10:33:11 08/18/06 (8)
- Re: addendum: disco sucked.. not - PAR 01:16:22 08/19/06 (7)
- Re: addendum: disco sucked.. not - Pinco Pallino 06:40:23 08/19/06 (6)
- Timing - Ted Smith 09:12:01 08/19/06 (5)
- Re: Timing - that's, my name 08:21:49 08/27/06 (2)
- Since you started it - Ted Smith 08:37:22 08/28/06 (1)
- Yeah yeah keep on talking... - that's, my name 07:16:48 09/04/06 (0)
- Re: Timing - Pinco Pallino 10:46:30 08/19/06 (1)
- Re: Timing - Ted Smith 11:13:26 08/19/06 (0)