![]() |
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
Register / Login
|
Let's for convenience sake agree that SACD sound is indeed superior to RBCD.My question: is SACD sound still superior to CD sound if the latter is delivered in digital form to digital processing and amplification equipment?
My personal experience tells me that SACD sound fed into a traditional analog chain is inferior to RBCD feeding into a digital (TACT or Behringer/Panasonic) upsampling system unless...
...maybe unless the analog chain is of the highest (costliest) type.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Pinco Pallino 00:53:39 08/15/06 (45)
- I agree with Ted and Todd - Quiet Earth 11:05:13 08/15/06 (16)
- mathematical comparison of formats - that's, my name 09:59:03 08/18/06 (15)
- Not quite - Ted Smith 14:01:49 08/18/06 (2)
- You answer before you read? - that's, my name 01:27:04 08/21/06 (1)
- Sorry, I read that paragraph backwards. [nt] - Ted Smith 08:04:48 08/21/06 (0)
- I wasn't comparing formats really. - Quiet Earth 11:49:48 08/18/06 (11)
- Re: I wasn't comparing formats really. - Pinco Pallino 23:50:29 08/18/06 (10)
- We don't ALL agree that CD sound is edgy. - Quiet Earth 11:06:18 08/21/06 (0)
- Upsampling doesn't remove the 20kHz brickwall filter - Slider 09:44:14 08/19/06 (7)
- Nope - Ted Smith 10:07:32 08/19/06 (6)
- Been around and around - Slider 10:17:38 08/19/06 (5)
- Nope - Ted Smith 11:22:08 08/19/06 (2)
- Oh really? - Slider 13:15:21 08/19/06 (1)
- Yep - Ted Smith 15:23:17 08/19/06 (0)
- Re: Been around and around - Pinco Pallino 11:12:29 08/19/06 (1)
- Re: Been around and around - Ted Smith 15:46:25 08/19/06 (0)
- You are on the right track - Ted Smith 09:07:41 08/19/06 (0)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Ted Smith 01:06:30 08/15/06 (2)
- edginess suxx - that's, my name 09:30:19 08/18/06 (1)
- What are you talking about? - Ted Smith 13:35:25 08/18/06 (0)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Todd Krieger 00:58:04 08/15/06 (23)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Pinco Pallino 10:21:51 08/16/06 (22)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Todd Krieger 22:03:34 08/16/06 (21)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Pinco Pallino 07:31:48 08/17/06 (6)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Todd Krieger 22:21:49 08/17/06 (5)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - that's, my name 09:36:40 08/18/06 (3)
- There is no need to soften edges of a given resolution - Ted Smith 09:19:53 08/19/06 (0)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Todd Krieger 22:35:47 08/18/06 (1)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Pinco Pallino 23:34:00 08/18/06 (0)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Pinco Pallino 02:49:07 08/18/06 (0)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - PAR 23:55:28 08/16/06 (13)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Pinco Pallino 07:27:58 08/17/06 (12)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - Todd Krieger 22:12:24 08/17/06 (0)
- Re: Once more: SACD vs RBCD - PAR 10:03:25 08/17/06 (10)
- musicians have a right to pick metronomes - that's, my name 10:13:40 08/18/06 (9)
- addendum: disco sucked.. not - that's, my name 10:33:11 08/18/06 (8)
- Re: addendum: disco sucked.. not - PAR 01:16:22 08/19/06 (7)
- Re: addendum: disco sucked.. not - Pinco Pallino 06:40:23 08/19/06 (6)
- Timing - Ted Smith 09:12:01 08/19/06 (5)
- Re: Timing - that's, my name 08:21:49 08/27/06 (2)
- Since you started it - Ted Smith 08:37:22 08/28/06 (1)
- Yeah yeah keep on talking... - that's, my name 07:16:48 09/04/06 (0)
- Re: Timing - Pinco Pallino 10:46:30 08/19/06 (1)
- Re: Timing - Ted Smith 11:13:26 08/19/06 (0)