In Reply to: DAC1 here too posted by Scrith on August 1, 2006 at 17:11:46:
Where do you people come up with this stuff?The DAC chip Lavry uses is almost the same as that in the Benchmark and from the same source. The difference is almost entirely in the (bit transparent) clocking mechanism in the Lavry, and also to the electronics (incl. avoiding a conventional volume control) after the DAC.
Mel
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - A simple jitter test? - that's, my name 11:35:10 07/31/06 (110)
- Re: A simple jitter test? - Bertie_Livingston 00:25:24 08/02/06 (0)
- Original Question - Scrith 11:01:02 08/01/06 (53)
- Here's another bit of interesting reading - Christine Tham 15:35:55 08/01/06 (7)
- thx for the interesting paper from 1992 - that's, my name 05:57:04 08/02/06 (6)
- I think I'm finally starting to understand what you are proposing ... - Christine Tham 15:32:30 08/02/06 (2)
- 800M was a joke - that's, my name 01:36:14 08/04/06 (0)
- Re: I think I'm finally starting to understand what you are proposing ... - Dawnrazor 20:45:27 08/02/06 (0)
- Re: thx for the interesting paper from 1992 - Dave Kingsland 14:02:18 08/02/06 (2)
- Re: thx for the interesting paper from 1992 - andy_c 17:53:05 08/02/06 (1)
- Thanks (nt) - Dave Kingsland 18:17:11 08/02/06 (0)
- P.S. Re S/PDIF - Ted Smith 13:15:49 08/01/06 (43)
- Re: P.S. Re S/PDIF - JLivermore 16:57:19 08/07/06 (0)
- Re: P.S. Re S/PDIF - Scrith 13:40:08 08/01/06 (41)
- Well, let me try... - andy_c 15:02:55 08/01/06 (34)
- Thanks! - Scrith 15:58:23 08/01/06 (33)
- CrystalLock is a PLL - Dave Kingsland 09:20:25 08/02/06 (0)
- Lavry's CrystalLock - that's, my name 05:22:53 08/02/06 (8)
- Re: Lavry's CrystalLock - Link - andy_c 08:35:52 08/02/06 (7)
- Re: Lavry's CrystalLock - Link - Dave Kingsland 10:34:04 08/02/06 (6)
- Lavry's CrystalLock - DAC style #5 - that's, my name 02:01:32 08/04/06 (1)
- Re: Lavry's CrystalLock - DAC style #5 - Dave Kingsland 11:10:58 08/06/06 (0)
- Appears to be a frequency-locked loop... - andy_c 11:02:19 08/02/06 (3)
- Yes and no - Dave Kingsland 18:13:55 08/02/06 (0)
- Re: Appears to be a frequency-locked loop... - Ted Smith 13:37:35 08/02/06 (1)
- The huge buffer approach in action - that's, my name 01:47:28 08/04/06 (0)
- Details, details. Jitter IS a problem. - Jon Risch 21:36:03 08/01/06 (2)
- we're not talking about conversion problems - that's, my name 05:03:20 08/02/06 (1)
- Unavoidable - Jon Risch 17:27:30 08/02/06 (0)
- Re: Thanks! - Ted Smith 16:42:18 08/01/06 (0)
- Re: Thanks! - andy_c 16:40:09 08/01/06 (18)
- DAC1 here too - Scrith 17:11:46 08/01/06 (17)
- Re: DAC1 here too - Mel 11:14:23 08/02/06 (0)
- Re: DAC1 here too - Bertie_Livingston 00:30:20 08/02/06 (12)
- Re: Nonsense! - Mel 11:24:57 08/02/06 (8)
- My foot... - Bertie_Livingston 13:28:14 08/02/06 (7)
- Re: Your foot... - Mel 20:20:20 08/02/06 (1)
- Re: Your foot... - Bertie_Livingston 06:25:40 08/03/06 (0)
- We'll see... - Scrith 16:05:44 08/02/06 (4)
- Great, keep us posted! (nt) - Bertie_Livingston 16:39:51 08/04/06 (0)
- Re: We'll see... - slwiser 14:51:23 08/03/06 (0)
- Re: We'll see... - Squonk 16:40:16 08/02/06 (0)
- Very cool! Keep us posted on the results! :-) (nt) - andy_c 16:13:16 08/02/06 (0)
- What? - Ted Smith 07:04:51 08/02/06 (2)
- Re: What? - Bertie_Livingston 13:32:43 08/02/06 (1)
- Yep, music is good :) [nt] - Ted Smith 13:39:53 08/02/06 (0)
- Re: DAC1 here too - Ted Smith 17:36:20 08/01/06 (2)
- Re: DAC1 here too - Scrith 18:47:29 08/01/06 (1)
- Cool idea - Ted Smith 20:08:51 08/01/06 (0)
- Re: P.S. Re S/PDIF - Ted Smith 14:21:41 08/01/06 (5)
- Re: P.S. Re S/PDIF - Scrith 16:17:12 08/01/06 (4)
- Ahh - Ted Smith 16:39:48 08/01/06 (3)
- firewire, HDMI, USB all fulfil your "pull" requirement - that's, my name 04:25:35 08/02/06 (2)
- Re: firewire, HDMI, USB all fulfil your "pull" requirement - Ted Smith 07:15:22 08/02/06 (0)
- (oops) - that's, my name 04:27:13 08/02/06 (0)
- Original Answer :) - Ted Smith 12:42:00 08/01/06 (0)
- You may find the following link interesting ... - Christine Tham 20:33:05 07/31/06 (11)
- Re: You may find the following link interesting ... - that's, my name 00:14:40 08/01/06 (10)
- Re: You may find the following link interesting ... - Dawnrazor 00:27:41 08/01/06 (9)
- Re: You may find the following link interesting ... - Pinco Pallino 07:40:08 08/01/06 (3)
- Hmm, creative reading. - Ted Smith 08:48:46 08/01/06 (2)
- error correction is history - that's, my name 01:48:34 08/02/06 (1)
- Re: error correction is history - Ted Smith 07:19:59 08/02/06 (0)
- jitter is old-fashioned ;) - that's, my name 01:29:29 08/01/06 (3)
- Are you paying attention? - Ted Smith 09:04:59 08/01/06 (2)
- Re: Are you paying attention? - that's, my name 01:31:08 08/02/06 (1)
- See my response below - Ted Smith 07:28:59 08/02/06 (0)
- data extraction errors do not happen - that's, my name 00:37:30 08/01/06 (0)
- Try these references - Atexanathome 18:08:46 07/31/06 (4)
- Re: Try these references - that's, my name 00:16:53 08/01/06 (3)
- OK, here's what your quoted wiki says about your "solution" - Ted Smith 09:14:03 08/01/06 (2)
- Re: OK, here's what your quoted wiki says about your "solution" - that's, my name 01:27:54 08/02/06 (1)
- #5? Ahh, if you are so smart why aren't you rich? - Ted Smith 07:26:38 08/02/06 (0)
- Here's a nice post from Dave Kingsland on the subject - Ted Smith 12:14:22 07/31/06 (12)
- jitter is a phenomenon, not a noise! - that's, my name 13:08:18 07/31/06 (11)
- You're really not getting this - Dave Kingsland 19:32:31 07/31/06 (9)
- Thanks - that was a pretty good summary - Christine Tham 15:45:32 08/01/06 (4)
- Isn't that the same as what I listed as #2? - Dave Kingsland 17:40:55 08/02/06 (2)
- Actually you are right - Christine Tham 19:21:25 08/02/06 (1)
- Just starting to read it - Dave Kingsland 10:56:20 08/06/06 (0)
- approach (5) ? - that's, my name 01:15:55 08/02/06 (0)
- the microprocessor in this - that's, my name 00:46:14 08/01/06 (2)
- I don't know what you mean by "full-blown microprocessor-based" - Dave Kingsland 19:03:22 08/02/06 (1)
- it's the large buffer approach - that's, my name 01:45:53 08/03/06 (0)
- Re: You're really not getting this - that's, my name 00:35:55 08/01/06 (0)
- Read my response below it answers all of your points. [nt] - Ted Smith 13:11:06 07/31/06 (0)
- Jitter doesn't change data. - Ted Smith 12:04:08 07/31/06 (24)
- So you say the data gets to other side safely? - that's, my name 12:48:59 07/31/06 (23)
- Read more carefully - Ted Smith 13:07:05 07/31/06 (22)
- Read more carefully (me or you?) - that's, my name 13:29:20 07/31/06 (3)
- Re: Read more carefully (me or you?) - Ted Smith 13:44:07 07/31/06 (2)
- Re: Read more carefully (me or you?) - Dave Kingsland 20:25:43 07/31/06 (1)
- Re: Read more carefully (me or you?) - that's, my name 00:52:08 08/01/06 (0)
- Re: Read more carefully - that's, my name 13:25:31 07/31/06 (17)
- You are getting closer - Ted Smith 13:37:14 07/31/06 (16)
- Yes, you are starting to get my point - that's, my name 13:53:55 07/31/06 (15)
- Nope, I thought you were getting mine :) - Ted Smith 14:37:03 07/31/06 (14)
- the jitter myth unveiled (it doesn't exist if treated properly) - that's, my name 14:59:41 07/31/06 (13)
- What makes sense - Bertie_Livingston 00:37:35 08/02/06 (5)
- digital mastering and bla - that's, my name 00:55:59 08/02/06 (4)
- Re: digital mastering and bla - ehlarson 13:31:44 08/05/06 (1)
- Re: digital mastering and bla - Squonk 16:06:04 08/05/06 (0)
- Re: digital mastering and bla - Bertie_Livingston 14:03:55 08/02/06 (0)
- Some do use atomic clocks - Ted Smith 07:51:42 08/02/06 (0)
- Right ;) - Ted Smith 15:17:31 07/31/06 (6)
- Re: Right ;) - ehlarson 19:13:55 08/06/06 (1)
- Re: Right ;) - Ted Smith 20:41:16 08/06/06 (0)
- it's the microprocessor - that's, my name 00:58:28 08/01/06 (3)
- Get real. - Ted Smith 08:21:40 08/01/06 (2)
- the bit perfect DAC - that's, my name 01:12:26 08/02/06 (1)
- Good luck. We've been over this ground [nt] - Ted Smith 06:59:55 08/02/06 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: DAC1 here too - Mel 11:14:23 08/02/06 (0)