|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
74.131.19.171
In Reply to: RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm posted by Audio Fan on October 09, 2007 at 13:51:14
> What do you think of A-T supplying the AT333R with a high mass headshell?
Probably just a marketing gimmick. It happens all the time.
In 1983 I bought the top-of-the-line Ortofon moving coil and it came with a beautiful 10-gram magnesium headshell. The cartridge itself weighed 11-grams. An engineer at Ortofon said to dump the headshell in the garbage and mount the cartridge in a low-mass SME III tonearm. That's why I bought a Thorens TD-126 Mk III with factory integrated SME III. I played that Ortofon MC-2000 for 10-years and it was the best sounding cartridge I've ever owned. It had an 8-Hz arm-cartridge resonance in my SME III.
Best regards,
John Elison
Follow Ups:
But you didn't try it with the 10g headshell. Lots of people used Ortofon 2000's in high mass arms with no problem. The reason that low mass arms were virtually dropped from production in the eighties is that medium and high mass arms sound better. Even SME went over to medium mass.
> Lots of people used Ortofon 2000's in high mass arms with no problem.
I'm talking about the original MC-2000, which was high-compliance and designed specifically for the SME Series III tonearm.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: