|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
74.131.19.171
In Reply to: RE: For anyone who thinks the AT33PTG needs a light arm posted by charlies824 on October 09, 2007 at 10:56:32
The AT33PTG that I tested had compliance at resonance of 25 x 10-6 cm/dyne. If yours has similar compliance then its system resonance will be no higher than 10-Hz in your low mass tonearm.
I suspect the other person's cartridge in the heavy headshell has a resonance of 4-Hz, which the HFNRR test Record cannot measure because it does not go that low. The second harmonic of 4-Hz is 8-Hz. My guess is that the 8-Hz test tone on the HFNRR test record is triggering the 4-Hz arm-cartridge resonance.
At any rate, if you try to measure arm-cartridge resonance in your system, I would recommend finding a better method than using the HFNRR test record. That test record is really pretty worthless as far as I'm concerned.
Best Regards,
John Elison
Follow Ups:
I was mostly just guessing based on the HFN test record results I got for Shure V15VxMR, Grado Red, and Denon 301II cartridges on this arm. Since the 14 Hz HFN frequency is really 12 or so Hz, your calculation of no higher than 10 Hz sounds about right. I'll let you know.
Charles S.
What do you think of A-T supplying the AT333R with a high mass headshell?
> What do you think of A-T supplying the AT333R with a high mass headshell?
Probably just a marketing gimmick. It happens all the time.
In 1983 I bought the top-of-the-line Ortofon moving coil and it came with a beautiful 10-gram magnesium headshell. The cartridge itself weighed 11-grams. An engineer at Ortofon said to dump the headshell in the garbage and mount the cartridge in a low-mass SME III tonearm. That's why I bought a Thorens TD-126 Mk III with factory integrated SME III. I played that Ortofon MC-2000 for 10-years and it was the best sounding cartridge I've ever owned. It had an 8-Hz arm-cartridge resonance in my SME III.
Best regards,
John Elison
But you didn't try it with the 10g headshell. Lots of people used Ortofon 2000's in high mass arms with no problem. The reason that low mass arms were virtually dropped from production in the eighties is that medium and high mass arms sound better. Even SME went over to medium mass.
> Lots of people used Ortofon 2000's in high mass arms with no problem.
I'm talking about the original MC-2000, which was high-compliance and designed specifically for the SME Series III tonearm.
need to get rid of those headshells.
Do you really think they'd supply a headshell that would compromise their top of the line cartridge?
use that headshell. Very little I would guess. About 80% of the people in vinyl asylum have arms with integrated headshells, like VPI, Rega, SME, triplanar, etc.
It's like buying a $2500 cd player that includes 99 cent interconnects and powercords, or a $60K BMW that has cheap all season radials.
Life is too short, stop worrying about it.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: